<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Lca analysis of popular envelope assemblies for low-storey construction segment

Вантажиться...
Ескіз

Дата

Науковий керівник

Редактор

Інші учасники

Відповідальний

ORCID

Назва журналу

Номер ISSN

Назва тому

DOI

Альтернативна назва

Анотація

The life cycle assessment (LCA) analysis of the popular multilayered assemblies for the low-storey construction segment was performed. The main point of the analysis was to detect the optimal assembly type in terms of LCA parameters from those considered in the investigation. As key influence criteria were taken into consideration as follows: primary energy non-renewable - global warming potential (GWP) kg CO2 equ./m2 , acidification potential (AP), kg SO2 equ./m2 , the u-value of the envelope W/m2K, the mass of the wall kg/m2 . There were compared five types of multilayered wall assemblies, which are quite popular in the domestic building market of Ukraine nowadays: brickwall+ insulator, aerated concrete+insulator, cavity brickwall+insulator, SIP wall, and strawbale wall in the type of infill as a variant of natural building material. The comparison of the alternatives was proceeded by the Eco2soft tool. Conducted research revealed that wall from Straw bale could be approximately defined as “optimal” and “best” ones in proposed terms of LCA analysis and Wall from SIP could be the medium one.

Опис

УДК

Тип документа

Мова

ISSN

Серія, номер

ISBN

ББК

Інші ідентифікатори

Пов’язані матеріали

Спонсорська підтримка

Правовласник

Бібліографічний опис

Бікс Ю. С. Lca analysis of popular envelope assemblies for low-storey construction segment [Електронний ресурс] / Ю. С. Бікс, Р. О. Лотоцький, О. Г. Ратушняк // Матеріали LI науково-технічної конференції підрозділів ВНТУ, Вінниця, 31 травня 2022 р. – Електрон. текст. дані. – 2022. – Режим доступу: https://conferences.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/all-fbtegp/all-fbtegp-2022/paper/view/15921.

Схвалення

Рецензія

Доповнено

Цитується в

Список використаної літератури (11)

  1. Biks Y., Ratushnyak G., Ratushnyak, O. Energy performance assessment of envelopes from organic materials. Architecture Civil Engineering Environment. 2019. № 3: P. 55-67. DOI: 0.21307/ACEE-2019-036.
  2. EU Directive proposal for the Energy performance of buildings. URL: https://www.iea.org/policies/14820-eu-directive-proposalfor-the-energy-performance-of-buildings?q=building%20sector%20energy%20consumption&s=1 (date of access 26.05.2022).
  3. Kulkarni S. P., Karve S., Kulkarni P. Assessment of building envelope material for embodied energy to reduce global warming and ozone depletion potential. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews. 2019, Vol.6, Issue1. P. 778-788.
  4. Efforts to make buildings greener are not working. URL: https://www.economist.com/international/2019/01/05/efforts-to-makebuildings-greener-are-not-working (date of access 26.05.2022).
  5. Wang J. J., Jing Y. Y., Zhang C. F., Zhao J. H. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decisionmaking. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 2009. Vol. 13. №9. Р. 2263-2278. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021.
  6. United Nations Environmental Programme, "Buildings and Climate Change," Sustainable Buildings & Climate Initiative, Ed., ed. Paris: UNEP, 2009.
  7. Basińska M. The use of multi-criteria optimization to choose solutions for energy-efficient buildings. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Technical Sciences. 2017. Vol. 65, №. 6. P. 815-826. DOI: 10.1515/bpasts-2017-0084.
  8. Vilčeková S.et al Energy and Environmental Evaluation of Non-Transparent Constructions of Building Envelope for Wooden Houses. Energies, 2015. Vol. 8. №. 10. P. 11047-11075.
  9. Stazi F. Thermal Inertia in Energy Efficient Building Envelopes. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12- 813970-7.00001-7.
  10. Eco2soft. Life style assessment for buildings. URL: https://www.baubook.at/eco2soft/?SW=27&lng=2 (date of access 15.05.2022)