<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Jan Śniadecki’s Philosophical Interpretations of the Concepts Explaining Beauty and Art

Вантажиться...
Ескіз

Дата

Автори

Назва журналу

Номер ISSN

Назва тому

Анотація

Analysing Śniadecki’s articles and chapters from his “Philosophy of Human Mind” dealing with the problems of aesthetic taste, style, wit, imagination and essence of beauty, we question a view of Śniadecki as a dogmatic proponent of Classicism and an enemy to Romanticism, which, in our view, is based on in-depth studies of his most famous nevertheless only one article “On Classical and Romantic Writings”. We suppose that French aesthetics is not the exclusive keystone of Śniadecki’s ideas. Therefore, we examine the peculiarities of his thought in the context of their relationship with the ideas by philosophers of the Scottish school of common sense and argue that these are close. His descriptions of taste and style, of the roles of imagination and sensory expressions are similar to Reid's and Stewart's ones. We show that Śniadecki strives to substantiate the objectivist view of aesthetics and rationally explain the essence of beauty and art, but, by surprise, his thought about the relationship between genius and rules is recalling Kantian view. Our conclusion is that Sniadecki's ideas might be attributed to at least neo-Classical, or even to pre-Romanticist period.

Опис

УДК

Тип документа

Мова

Є частиною

Бібліографічний опис

Vabalaite R. M. Jan Śniadecki’s Philosophical Interpretations of the Concepts Explaining Beauty and Art [Текст] / R. M. Vabalaite // Sententiae. – 2020. – № 1. – С. 60-54.

Зібрання

Схвалення

Рецензія

Доповнено

Цитується в

Список використаної літератури (11)

  1. Addison, J. (1891a). No. 160 Monday, September 3, 1711. In H. Morley (Ed.), The Spectator in three volumes (Vol. I). London: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/ 12030/12030-h/12030-h/SV1/Spectator1.html#
  2. Addison, J. (1891b). No. 419 Tuesday, July 1, 1712. In H. Morley (Ed.), The Spectator in three volumes (Vol. III). London: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/ 12030/12030-h/12030-h/SV3/Spectator3.html#
  3. Chamcówna, M. (1963). Jan Śniadecki, Kraków: Nakładem Uniwersitetu Jagiellońskiego PWN.
  4. Chrzanowski, I. (2003). Historia literatury polskiej (T. 2). Kraków: Collegium Columbinum.
  5. Costelloe, T. M. (2013). The British Aesthetic Tradition. From Shaftesbury to Wittgenstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139023399
  6. Kant, I. (1987). Critique of Judgement. Indianapolis, & Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
  7. Morawski, S. (1957). Polish Theories of Art between 1830 and 1850. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 16(2), 217-236.
  8. Morawski, S. (1961). Studia z historii myśli estetycznej XVIII i XIX wieku. Warszawa: PWN. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139023399
  9. Reid, Th. (1852). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. In W. Hamilton (Ed). The Works of Thomas Reid, D.D. (pp. 213-508). Edinburgh: Maclachlan and Stewart.
  10. Stewart, D. (1816). Philosophical essays. Edinburgh: George Ramsay and Company. Retrieved from https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.$b79124