<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Деконструкційний поворот у трансцендентальному мисленні

Вантажиться...
Ескіз

Дата

Назва журналу

Номер ISSN

Назва тому

Анотація

The paper addresses the problem of the place of deconstruction in the history of transcendental philosophy. J. Derrida’s project is considered as one of the most representative and consistent realizations of theoretical foundations of transcendentalism along with prominent conceptions such as Kant’s critique and Husserl’s phenomenology. The author suggests a number of attributes of transcendental thinking that allow historical reconstruction of the transcendental paradigm. Derridian approach is considered as a turn towards this tradition, conceived as a transcendental tradition par exellence, guided by the attitude of «turning. Historical legacy of deconstructive «turning» is analyzed with respect to Husserlian Rückfrage: return-inquiry as method, idea and attitude, reproducing in deconstructive strategy of interpretative critique. A concept of hyperbolic transcendentalism is introduced in order to (1) define a deconstructive version of transcendental philosophy and (2) indicate an immanent tendency in the transcendental thought, constitutive for both Kantian critical project and Husserlian strive towards intellectual radicalism extending from methodological hyperboles (reduction and epoche) to radicalization of «transcendental motive». The author relies upon the concept of quasi-transcendental (thematized by Derrida himself), which defines a mode of de-dogmatization, critical purifying and preservation of proper transcendental foundations of philosophical thinking.

Опис

УДК

Тип документа

Мова

Є частиною

Бібліографічний опис

Ільїна І. Деконструкційний поворот у трансцендентальному мисленні [Текст] / І. Ільїна // Sententiae. – 2015. – № 2. – С. 125-148.

Зібрання

Схвалення

Рецензія

Доповнено

Цитується в

Список використаної літератури (18)

  1. Bello (2011): Bello, A. A. «The Transcendental: Husserl and Kant». In: Analecta Husserliana, 2011, Vol. CVIII: Transcendentalism Overturned, P. 229–243.
  2. Bennington, Derrida (1999): Bennington, J., Derrida, J. Jacques Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999, 420 p.
  3. Chung Chin-Yi (2008): Chung Chin-Yi. «Deconstruction and the Transformation of Husserlian Phenomenology». In: Kritike, Vol. 2, 2008, № 2, P. 77–94.
  4. Chung Chin-Yi (2011): Chung Chin-Yi. «On Derrida’s Methodology». In: Movimiento Paroxista, 2011, Año 1, Vol. 1, P. 33–47.
  5. Colerbrook (2003): Colebrook, C. «The Opening to Infinity: Derrida’s Quasi-Transcendentals». In: From Kant to Davidson: Philosophy and the Idea of the Transcendental. London, New York: Routledge, 2003, P. 162–183.
  6. Doyon (2014): Doyon, M. «The Transcendental Claim of Deconstruction». In: A Companion to Derrida. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014, P. 132–149.
  7. Gasché (1986): Gasché, R. The Tain of the Mirror: Derrida and the Philosophy of Reflection. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1986, 348 p.
  8. Gasché (1999): Gasché, R. Of Minimal Things: Studies on the Notion of Relation. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1999, 380 p.
  9. Gasché (2009): Gasché, R. «European Memories: Jan Patocka and Jacques Derrida on Responsibility». In: Critical Inquiry, Vol. 33, 2007, No. 2, P. 291–311.
  10. Haddad (2013): Haddad, S. Derrida and the Inheritance of Democracy. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2013, 192 p.