Порно(у)топія маркіза де Сада: «Філософія в будуарі» vs «Бенкет»
Вантажиться...
Файли
Дата
Автори
Назва журналу
Номер ISSN
Назва тому
Анотація
The article studies philosophical, political, educational program of Marquis de Sade as an attempt to do away with the tradition of Platonic-Christian philosophizing, deconstruct its meaning and form. “Philosophy in the Bedroom” is interpreted as a parody of “Symposium” of Plato, which presents its own Sadian materialist conception as the opposite of Plato's metaphysics. In this context, we prove some essential theses in relation to the historical and philosophical significance of the Sadian heritage: 1. Sade creates an original controversy of Plato's dialogue, introducing new Conceptual Personae according to gender and class distinction and complementing theory and practice. 2. The practice enables the transition from erotological discourse to pornographic discourse and transform Platonic idealist seduction as part of Paideia into the pedagogics of the materialistic lechery. 3. The pornographic discourse allows Sade to create a new conceptual apparatus by which an apology for sensual pleasure is opposed to the ideology of Platonic love. 4. His own utopia/pornotopia of the individual pleasure deconstructing the utopias of the public good of Plato's “Republic” and republicanism of the Enlightenment. 5. Thus Sade tried to make the foundations for a new stage of philosophizing, which would occur after the revolution.
Опис
Ключові слова
УДК
Тип документа
Мова
Є частиною
Бібліографічний опис
Перепелиця О. Порно(у)топія маркіза де Сада: «Філософія в будуарі» vs «Бенкет» [Текст] / О. Перепелиця // Sententiae. – 2016. – № 1. – С. 95-110.
Зібрання
Схвалення
Рецензія
Доповнено
Цитується в
Список використаної літератури (34)
- Abramovici, J. (2015). Sade et les limites du corps. Cadernos de Ética e Filosofia Política, 1(26), 233-239. Retrieved from http://www.revistas.usp.br/cefp/article/view/108677
- Allison, D. B., Roberts, M. S., & Weiss, A. S. (Eds.). (1995). Sade and the narrative of transgression. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511519413
- Barthes, R. (2007). Sade, Fourier, Loyola. [In Russian]. Moscow: Praxis.
- Beauvoir, S. de. (1967). Must We Burn Sade. In Marquis de Sade, The 120 Days of Sodom and Other Writings (pp. 35-64). New York: Grove Press.
- Deleuze, G. (1992). Presentation of Sacher-Masoch. [In Russian]. In A. V. Garadja (Ed.), Venus in Furs. L. von Sacher-Masoch. Venus in Furs. G. Deleuze. Presentation of Sacher-Masoch. S. Freud. Works about Masochism (pp. 189-313). Moscow: RIK Kultura.
- Delon, M. (2015). Sade, un humanisme impossible? Cadernos de Ética e Filosofia Política, 1(26), 220-232. Retrieved from http://www.revistas.usp.br/cefp/article/view/108678
- Foucault, M. (2010). A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. [In Russian]. Moscow: AST, & AST MOSKVA.
- Gallop, J. (1982). The Immoral Teachers. Yale French Studies, 63, 117-128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2929835
- Gallop, J. (2005). The Liberated Woman. Narrative, 13(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2005.0009
- Hénaff, M. (2005). Sade: The Invention of The Libertine Body. [In Russian]. Saint Petersburg: Humanitarian Academy.