<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Метод визначення цільових показників продуктивності програмного забезпечення

dc.contributor.authorStorozhuk, Yu. V.en
dc.contributor.authorKovalenko, O. O.en
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-08T10:16:17Z
dc.date.available2026-01-08T10:16:17Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractDevelopment of the methods for the determination of the target indices for measuring the quality level , performance reliability is one of the important directions in the sphere of information technologies and, in particular, software engineering. Among the known methods we can distinguish the method of balanced management indicators, SMART-techniques, etc. GIST (Goals, Ideas, Step-Projects, Tasks) methodology it is the method of production planning, elaborated by I. Gilad former Google production manager. This methodology is aimed at reduction of the overhead cost for management, enhancement of the speed of development and creation of the products, which meet the requirements of the market and their subject area. Defining target performance indicators remains a pressing challenge for modern DevOps teams. They are frequently caught between two extremes: collecting thousands of time-series metrics, which inflates costs and alert noise, or, conversely, collecting too little data and missing performance regressions. Lightweight checklists such as the Four Golden Signals or RED/USE lower the entry barrier but remain static; they ignore business goals, service criticality, and lifecycle stage. The paper proposes to improve GIST (Goal Impact Stage Template) method for measuring software performance (GISTSP). Objective c of the study is to create and evaluate the method of target indices formation on the base of the methodology of metrics collection GIST. The suggested GIST method (Goal – Impact – Stage – Template) relies on a four-line “service passport” and a Coreplus-Plus metric library. By following a “collect only what you need” rule, GIST automatically generates Prometheus/Grafana configurations and alert rules. The approach was experimentally compared with Four GS, RED/USE, and AWS W-A on four testbeds (Web-API, Queue, Stream, Batch). Results show that required SLI coverage increased from 78 % to 92 %; daily metric volume decreased by 60 %; setup time was reduced by a factor of four, while the F₁-score for regression detection did not degrade. These findings indicate that GIST achieves a practic.en
dc.identifier.citationСторожук Ю. В., Коваленко О. О. Метод визначення цільових показників продуктивності програмного забезпечення // Вісник Вінницького політехнічного інституту. 2025. № 4. С. 108–117. URI: https://visnyk.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/visnyk/article/view/3309.uk
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.31649/1997-9266-2025-181-4-108-117
dc.identifier.issn1997-9274
dc.identifier.udc004.4
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/50387
dc.language.isouk_UAuk_UA
dc.publisherВінницький національний технічний університетuk
dc.relation.ispartofВісник Вінницького політехнічного інституту. № 4 : 108–117.uk
dc.relation.referencesV. S. Yakovyna, M. M Seniv, I. I. Symets, and N. B. Sambir, “Algorithms and software suite for reliability assessment of complex technical systems,” Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, no. (4), pp. 163-177, 2020. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2020-4-16 .en
dc.relation.referencesT. Murphy, and K. Cormican, “Towards holistic goal centered performance management in software development: lessons from a best practice analysis,” IJISPM, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 23-36, Feb. 2022.en
dc.relation.referencesISO/IEC, “ISO/IEC 25010:201, Systems and software engineering – Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) — System and software quality models,” 2011. [Electronic resource]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/35733.html#lifecycle .en
dc.relation.referencesI. Gilad the GIST Board and Other GIST Tools. Tech. Rep., Dec.2019. [Online]. Available: https://itamargilad.com/thegist-board-and-other-gist-tools/ .en
dc.relation.references4 SRE Golden Signals (What they are and why they matter), Blameless Community. 2023. [Electronic resource]. Available: https://www.blameless.com/blog/4-sre-golden-signals-what-they-are-and-why-they-matter .en
dc.relation.referencesB. Gregg, “The USE Method,” 2023. [Electronic resource]. Available: http://www.brendangregg.com/usemethod.html .en
dc.relation.referencesDatadog “Application Performance Monitoring (APM),” Datadog Documentation”2025. [Electronic resource]. Available: https://docs.datadoghq.com/tracing/ .en
dc.relation.referencesAmazon Web Services, “Performance Efficiency Pillar - AWS Well-Architected Framework,” AWS Well-Architected Documentation. 2025. [Electronic resource]. Available: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/wellarchitected/latest/performanceefficiency-pillar/welcome.html .en
dc.relation.urihttps://visnyk.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/visnyk/article/view/3309
dc.subjectsoftware engineeringen
dc.subjectsoftware testingen
dc.subjectsoftware performance testingen
dc.subjectperformance metricsen
dc.subjecttarget performance indicatorsen
dc.subjectDevOpsen
dc.subjectalgorithmsen
dc.subjecttemplatesen
dc.subjectperformance-testing knowledge basesen
dc.subjectIT-projecen
dc.titleМетод визначення цільових показників продуктивності програмного забезпеченняuk
dc.title.alternativeMethod for Determining Target Software Performance Indicatorsen
dc.typeArticle, professional native edition
dc.typeArticle

Файли

Контейнер файлів

Зараз показуємо 1 - 1 з 1
Вантажиться...
Ескіз
Назва:
190540.pdf
Розмір:
382,19 KB
Формат:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Ліцензійна угода

Зараз показуємо 1 - 1 з 1
Вантажиться...
Ескіз
Назва:
license.txt
Розмір:
129 B
Формат:
Plain Text
Опис: