Обґрунтування вибору оптимальної HRM-системи засобами математичного моделювання
Вантажиться...
Дата
Назва журналу
Номер ISSN
Назва тому
Анотація
The article is devoted to developing an approach to justifying the optimal HRM system (system of human resources
management) on economic entities using a linear model of weighted sums. The results of the study of the existing modern
systems of human resources management, their criterion analysis, and the weight of evaluation criteria are the input data
of such a mathematical model. The work explores the functionality and analyzes the most common human resources
management systems, in particular, «Zoho People», «OrangeHRM», «CakeHR», «Workable», «BambooHR», «SAP
SuccessFactors», «Workday HCM», «DelоPro», «HugeProfit», «ISpro», «Scala HR», «Axapta HR Management»,
«IRenaissance Human Resources / Payroll», «Hurma System», «Vchasno». The study revealed that the use of latest systems
of human resources management provides many advantages which must be evaluated only by taking into account their
shortcomings which allows for achieving an effective application of modern HRM systems. The constructed mathematical
model made it possible to substantiate the optimal HRM system for the enterprise (or organization) today which is
«HURMA».
Опис
УДК
Тип документа
Мова
Бібліографічний опис
Обґрунтування вибору оптимальної HRM-системи засобами математичного моделювання [Текст] / А. О. Азарова, Ю. В. Міронова, О. С. Ярмола, А. В. Поплавський // Innovation and Sustainability. – 2023. – № 1. – С. 246-257.
Схвалення
Рецензія
Доповнено
Цитується в
Список використаної літератури (14)
- Hermans, M., Ulrich, Michael D. (2021) How symbolic human resource function actions affect the implementation of high‐performance work practice: The mediating effect of influence on strategic decision‐making, pp. 245–253. DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12361.
- Hauff, S. (2019) Analytical strategies in HRM systems research: a comparative analysis and some recommendations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 32(9), pp. 1923 – 1952. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2018.1547779.
- Hauff, S., Alewell, D., & Hansen, N. K. (2017) HRM systems strength and HRM target achievement – Towards a broader understanding of HRM processes. Human Resource Management, 56(5), 715–729.
- Snell, S., Morris, S. (2019) Time for realignment: the HR ecosystem. Academy of Management Perspectives 35(2), pp. 219 – 236. DOI: 10.5465/amp.2018.0069.
- Saks, Alan M. (2021) Caring human resources management and employee engagement, pp. 430-444. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100835.
- Beijer S, R Peccei, M van Veldhoven and Paauwe, J. (2019) The turn to employees in the measurement of human resource practices: a critical review and proposed way forward. Human Resources Management Journal, pp. 1– 17 DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12229.
- Jeronimo, H., Teresa Correia de Lacerda, Paulo Lopes Henriques (2020) From Sustainable HRM to Employee Performance: A Complex and Intertwined Road, pp. 511-534. DOI: 10.1111/emre.12402.
- Miao, R., Bozionelos, N., Zhou, W., Newman, A. (2020) High-performance work systems and key employee attitudes: the roles of psychological capital and an interactional justice climate, pp. 530-546. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2019.1710722.
- Garg, S., Jiang, K., Lepak, David P. (2020) HR practice salience: explaining variance in employee reactions to HR practices, pp. 420-435. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2020.1792533.
- Sorribes, J., Celma, D., Martinez-Garcia, E. (2021) Sustainable human resources management in crisis contexts: Interaction of socially responsible labor practices for the wellbeing of employees, pp. 720-741. DOI: 10.1002/csr.2111.