<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Пірронізм, епістемологія незгоди, природа раціональності. Machuca, D. (2022). Pyrrhonism Past and Present: Inquiry, Disagreement, Self-Knowledge, and Rationality. Cham: Springer.

Ескіз

Файли

200980.pdf (320,39 KB)

Дата

2026

Автори

Назва журналу

Номер ISSN

Назва тому

Видавець

Вінницький національний технічний університет

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31649/sent45.01.159

Анотація

Review of Machuca, D. (2022). Pyrrhonism Past and Present: Inquiry, Disagreement, Self-Knowledge, and Rationality. Cham: Springer. &nbsp.

Опис

Ключові слова

Sextus Empiricus , Agrippa's trilemma , abstention , deflationary rationalism , normativity , tropes of skepticism , variational induction

УДК

Тип документа

Article, professional native edition
Article

Мова

uk_UA

Є частиною

Sententiae. № 1 : 159-172.

ISSN

2308-8915

Бібліографічний опис

Луковина О. Пірронізм, епістемологія незгоди, природа раціональності. Machuca, D. (2022). Pyrrhonism Past and Present: Inquiry, Disagreement, Self-Knowledge, and Rationality. Cham: Springer // Sententiae. 2026. № 1. С. 159-172. URI: https://sententiae.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/sententiae/article/view/1227.

URI

https://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/51435

Зібрання

Sententiae. 2026. № 1

Схвалення

Рецензія

Доповнено

Цитується в

Список використаної літератури (22)

  1. Ballantyne, N. (2013). The problem of historical variability. In D. E. Machuca (Ed.), Disagreement and skepticism (pp. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073346-12
  2. Ballantyne, N. (2015). The significance of unpossessed evidence. The Philosophical Quarterly, 65(260), 315-335. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqu096
  3. Cleve, J. van. (2003). Is knowledge easy–or impossible? Externalism as the only alternative to skepticism. In S. Luper (Ed.), The skeptics: Contemporary essays (pp. 45-59). Aldershot: Ashgate.
  4. Fogelin, R. J. (1994). Pyrrhonian reflections on knowledge and justification. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195089871.001.0001
  5. Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  6. Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for mortals: How people cope with uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195328981.001.0001
  7. Lukovyna, O. (2022). Defense of Authentic Neo-Pyrrhonism. Smith, P. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Cham: Springer. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 41(2), 124-143. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.02.124
  8. Lukovyna, O. (2023). Contemporariety of Ancient Scepticism [In Ukrainian]. Vogt, K., & Vlasits, J. (Eds.). (2020). Epistemology After Sextus Empiricus. New York: Oxford UP. Sententiae, 42(3), 134-140. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent42.03.134
  9. Machuca, D. (2020). Epistemology after Sextus Empiricus. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/epistemology-after-sextus-empiricus/
  10. Machuca, D. E. (2022). Pyrrhonism past and present: Inquiry, disagreement, self-knowledge, and rationality. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91210-9