<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Епістемологічна проблема ens rationis у посттридентській схоластиці і сучасна філософія штучного інтелекту

Вантажиться...
Ескіз

Дата

Назва журналу

Номер ISSN

Назва тому

Анотація

The article analyzes the possibility of using the post-Tridentine scholastic concept of the being of reason to address issues in the philosophy of artificial intelligence (AI). The authors argue that the concepts of the being of reason developed by Pedro da Fonseca and Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza can serve as a tool for analyzing cognitive processes in AI language models. This is grounded in two key premises: first, artificial intelligence processes replicate the processes of natural human intelligence; second, the scholastic distinction between real being and being of reason enables a clear differentiation between real and fictional objects that exist only due to the cognitive operations of AI. By examining the causes underlying the emergence of the being of reason (powers of the soul and operations of the intellect), the authors draw parallels with contemporary algorithms used to generate fictional objects. As a result, it is concluded that the scholastic concept of the "ens rationis" points to an analogy between the mechanisms of forming beings of reason in the human intellect and the generation of fiction produced by AI systems.

Опис

УДК

Мова

Є частиною

Бібліографічний опис

Шаповалов, В., Морозов, А. Епістемологічна проблема ens rationis у посттридентській схоластиці і сучасна філософія штучного інтелекту // Sententiae. 2025. № 1. С. 42-61. URI: https://sententiae.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/sententiae/article/view/1107.

Зібрання

Схвалення

Рецензія

Доповнено

Цитується в

Список використаної літератури (12)

  1. Gizel, I. (1645-1647). Opus totius philosophiae. [Philosophical course].The institute of manuscripts (fonds 303, item Mel.m./p128, fol. 1 - 678v ). VNLU, Kyiv.
  2. Konyskyi, G. (1749-51). Philosophia juxta numerum quatuor facultatum... [Philosophical course]. The Institute of Manuscripts (fonds 312, item 635, fol. 1-163v).VNLU, Kyiv.
  3. Yavorskyi, S. (1691-1693). Agonium philosophicum in arena gymnadis...[Philosophical course]. The institute of manuscripts (fonds 8, item 60M/42, fol. 1-576). VNLU, Kyiv.
  4. Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In K. Frankish & W. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Deely, J. (2009). Purely objective reality. In Purely Objective Reality. Berlin & New York: Mouton; de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078099.
  6. Embry, B. (2019). Francisco Suárez on beings of reason and non-strict ontological pluralism. Philosophers Imprint, 19(27), 1-15.
  7. Goczał, R. (2021). The Concept of Being of Reason as the Final Step in the Metaphysical Cognition by Francisco Suarez. Perspectiva. Legnickie Studia Teologiczno-Historyczne, 20(2), 16-30.
  8. Müller, V. C. (Ed.). (2022). Philosophy and theory of artificial intelligence 2021.Cham: Springer.
  9. Novotný, D. D. (2013). Ens rationis from Suarez to Caramuel: A study in scholasticism of the Baroque Era.New York: Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-1418.
  10. Russell, S. (2019). Human Compatible: AI and the Problem of Control. New York: Viking.