<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Філософський аспект лексеми «фортуна» в текстах Антонія Радивиловського

Вантажиться...
Ескіз

Дата

Автори

Назва журналу

Номер ISSN

Назва тому

Анотація

The article contains the historico-philosophical analysis of the lexical and conceptual aspects of the concept of “fortuna” in the texts of Antoniy Radyvylovs’kyj (further A.R.). This problem has not been studied by historians of philosophy yet. The analysis is carried out in the context of Ukrainian moral thought of the Baroque period (1610 - 1680-s). The author proposes the historico-philosophical interpretation of A.R.’s use of the lexeme fortuna and its doublets on the basis of Vilen Gorsky’s methodology. For the first time it has been proven that: (1) the lexeme fortuna was usually translated by Ukrainian intellectuals of the Baroque period as “happiness”; (2) but the fortuna was interpreted by A.R. as the instrument in God’s hands and, therefore, may have either a positive or a negative meaning, depending on the divine providence and the moral virtues of a Christian; (3) the special aspects of how A.R. used the lexical item fortuna and its doublets are: a) the preacher used a Latin lexeme fortuna which is not typical for his entourage; b) depending on the situations, these lexical items may be interchangeable or get specific connotations; (4) in the texts of A.R. the content of the lexeme “fortuna” had not been a full-fledged philosophical concept yet, however it constituted an element of the worldview and beliefs about human destiny, luck, abilities, and happiness; but at the same time A.R.’s views on the fortune are directly based on the texts of ancient and modern Stoics: in particular, Seneca, Boethius, and Lipsius.

Опис

УДК

Тип документа

Мова

Є частиною

Бібліографічний опис

Співак В. Філософський аспект лексеми «фортуна» в текстах Антонія Радивиловського [Текст] / В. Співак // Sententiae. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 30-46.

Зібрання

Схвалення

Рецензія

Доповнено

Цитується в

Список використаної літератури (39)

  1. Bartolini, M. G. (2016). The Discourse of Martyrdom in Late Seventeenth-Century Ukraine. The ‘passion-sufferers’ Boris and Gleb in the Homilies of Antonij Radyvylovs’kyj and Lazar Baranovyč. Zeitschrift für Slawistik, 61(3), 499-527. https://doi.org/10.1515/slaw-2016-0030
  2. Boethius, S. (2002). The Consolation of Philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Osnovy.
  3. Brendecke, A., & Vogt, P. (2017). The End of Fortuna and the Rise of Modernity. Berlin, & Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110455045
  4. Brogi Bercoff, G. (2003). Rus, Ukraina, Ruthenia, Wielkie Ksiestvo Litewskie, Rzeczpospolita, Moskva, Rosja, Europa Srodkowo-Wschodnia: o wielowartwowosti i polifunkcjonalizmie kulturowym. In A. Albertietal et al. (Ed.), Contributi italiani al XIII congresso internationale degli slavisti (pp. 325-387). Firenze: Firenze UP.
  5. Brogi Bercoff, G. (2012). The Sermons of Antoniy Radyvylovs’kyj: History, Culture, Mentality. In N. Bilous et al. (Eds.), Theatrum humanae vitae. Studia in honorem Natala Jakovenko (pp. 414-424). Kyiv: Laurus.
  6. Brogi Bercoff, G. (2014-2015). Choice of language and choice of culture in Ukraine of XVII century. [In Ukrainian]. Kyivan Academy, 12, 33-45.
  7. Brown, D. J. (2006). Descartes and the Passionate Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554513
  8. Cassin, B. (2009). Τύχη and αὐτόματον at Aristotle. [In Ukrainian]. In B. Cassin, & K. Sigov (Eds.), Vocabulaire européen des philosophies: Dictionnaire des intraduisibles (Vol. I, p. 365). Kyiv: Duh i litera.
  9. Chyzhevsky, D. (1992). Essays on the History of Philosophy in Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Oriy.
  10. Dovga, L. (2012). The system of values in the Ukrainian culture of the XVII century. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv, & Lviv: Svichado.