Difficulty balancing methods in simulators with leveling systems
Вантажиться...
Файли
Дата
Назва журналу
Номер ISSN
Назва тому
DOI
Анотація
The paper examines difficulty balancing methods in video games and simulators with player leveling systems. Key approaches are described: static and dynamic balancing, adaptive difficulty systems, learning curves and progression design. Their advantages, disadvantages, and applicability to creative activity simulators are analyzed.
Опис
Ключові слова
УДК
Тип документа
Мова
ISSN
Бібліографічний опис
Вишнівська В. В., Коваленко О. О. Difficulty balancing methods in simulators with leveling systems // Матеріали Міжнародної науково-практичної інтернет-конференції «Молодь в науці: дослідження, проблеми, перспективи (МН-2026)», м. Вінниця, 22-26 червня 2026 р. Електрон. текст. дані. 2026. URI: https://conferences.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/mn/mn2026/paper/view/29803.
Схвалення
Рецензія
Доповнено
Цитується в
Список використаної літератури (8)
- , and skill levels – is the foundation of modern adaptive systems. Models may be explicit (derived from direct measurement) or implicit (inferred from behavioral data). Combining both approaches yields robust profiles that support accurate difficulty calibration [1; 3]. Conclusions Difficulty balancing in leveling simulators is a multifaceted engineering and design challenge that spans static configuration, dynamic adaptation, and intelligent player modeling. The most effective modern approaches combine progression system design with real-time adaptive mechanisms informed by behavioral data. For creative activity simulators in particular, balancing must account for subjective success criteria and the value of player exploration, suggesting that hybrid DDA-PCG systems represent a promising direction. Further research into player modeling for creative domains and the application of machine learning to difficulty calibration will be essential for advancing the field. REFERENCES
- Yannakakis G. N., Togelius J. Artificial Intelligence and Games. Springer, 2018. 356 p.
- Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row, 1990. 303 p.
- Aponte M., Levieux G., Natkin S. Measuring the difficulty of single-player video games. Entertainment Computing. 2011. Vol. 2, No. 4. P. 205–213.
- Difficulty in Resident Evil 4: Game Mechanics Analysis. Gamasutra. URL: https://www.gamedeveloper.com (date of access: 25.05.2026).
- Hunicke R., Chapman V. AI for Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment in Games. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI. 2004. P. 91–96.
- Schell J. The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses. 3rd ed. CRC Press, 2019. 600 p.
- Riedl M. O., Bulitko V. Interactive Narrative: An Intelligent Systems Approach. AI Magazine. 2013. Vol. 34, No. 1. P. 67–78.