Neo-Pyrrhonism: a contemporary version of skepticism
Вантажиться...
Дата
Автори
Назва журналу
Номер ISSN
Назва тому
Анотація
This paper presents and argues for a contemporary version of skepticism: neo-Pyrrhonism. Interest in the history of skepticism engendered a new, more complex and attractive conception of skepticism. Accordingly, many philosophers now claim they are skeptics. In line with what they say, I develop neo-Pyrrhonism as I see it. It has a negative part, in which dogmas are criticized, and a positive one: first, the neo-Pyrrhonist lives his life according to his skeptical principles and following everyday life, and, second, he is able to describe philosophically his skeptical view of the world, thereby offering possible solutions to philosophical problems empirically conceived.
Опис
Ключові слова
УДК
Тип документа
Мова
Є частиною
Бібліографічний опис
Plínio Junqueira Smith Neo-Pyrrhonism: a contemporary version of skepticism [Текст] / Plínio Junqueira Smith // Sententiae. – 2023. – № 3. – С. 47-66.
Зібрання
Схвалення
Рецензія
Доповнено
Цитується в
Список використаної літератури (33)
- Aikin, S. (2010). Epistemology and the regress problem. New York & London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203833247
- Bailey, A. (2002). Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonean Scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198238522.001.0001
- Barnes, J. (1998). The beliefs of a Pyrrhonist. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original sceptics: a controversy (pp. 58-91). Indianapolis & Cambrdige: Hackett.
- Berkeley, G. (1998). A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge. (J. Dancy, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford UP.
- Bueno, O. (2015). Realism and anti-realism about science: a Pyrrhonian stance. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, 5(2), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-04031176
- Burnyeat, M., & Frede, M. (Eds.). (1998). The original sceptics: a controversy. Indianapolis & Cambrdige: Hackett.
- Burnyeat, M. (1998). Can the sceptic live his scepticism? In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original sceptics: a controversy (pp. 25-57). Indianapolis & Cambrdige: Hackett.
- Fogelin, R. J. (1994). Pyrrhonian reflections on knowledge and justification. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195089871.001.0001
- Fogelin, R. J. (2003). Walking on the tightrope of reason: the precarious life of a rational animal. Oxford: Oxford UP.
- Fogelin, R. J. (2004). “The skeptics are coming! The skeptics are coming!” In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Pyrrhonian skepticism (pp. 161-173). Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195169727.003.0009