Показати скорочену інформацію

dc.contributor.authorTkachenko, R.en
dc.contributor.authorТкаченко, Р.uk
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-24T07:08:53Z
dc.date.available2021-03-24T07:08:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationTkachenko R. A system of methodological coordinates for a historiographer of medieval philosophy: a proposal of an explanatory tool [Текст] / R. Tkachenko // Sententiae. – 2020. – № 2. – С. 8-28.en
dc.identifier.issn2075-6461
dc.identifier.issn2308-8915
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua//handle/123456789/31650
dc.description.abstractThe last thirty years of scholarship in western medieval philosophical historiography have seen a number of reflections on the methodological paradigms, schools, trends, and dominant approaches in the field. As a contribution to this ongoing assessment of the existing methods of studies in medieval philosophy and theology and a supplement to classifications offered by M. Colish, J. Inglis, C. König- Pralong, J. Marenbon, A. de Libera, and others, the article offers another explanatory tool. Here is a description of an imaginary system of methodological coordinates that systematizes the current tendencies by placing them in a three-dimensional system of axes. Every axis corresponds to a certain aspect of the historical and systematic research in medieval thought and symbolizes a possible movement between two extremes representing opposite methodological values and directions. The methods and approaches practiced in recent studies in medieval philosophy and theology might be sche-matically located inside this general system of argumentational, focal (or objectival), and (con)textual axes with their intersection identified with what some scholars call the “integral” model of study. This explanatory tool allows one to see how current approaches and methods form a panoply of axes that belong together in one complex grid and helps to visualize the tapestry of existing approaches in medieval philosophical historiography.en
dc.description.abstractОстанні тридцять років досліджень у філософській історіографії західноєвропейських Се-редніх віків ознаменувалися появою низки роздумів про методологічні парадигми, школи, те-нденції й панівні підходи в цій галузі. Стаття описує новий пояснювальний інструмент, що може виявитися корисним у процесі постійної оцінки наявних методів вивчення середньовіч-ної філософії й теології та доповнити класифікації, запропоновані свого часу М. Коліш, Дж. Інглісом, К. Кьоніґ-Пралонґ, Дж. Маренбоном, А. де Лібера та іншими. У статті представлено опис уявної системи методологічних координат, яка систематизує поточні тенденції, поміщаючи їх у тривимірну систему осей. Кожна вісь відповідає певному аспектові історичного й систематичного дослідження середньовічної думки та символізує можливий рух між двома крайнощами, що представляють протилежні методологічні цінності й напрямки. Методи й підходи, що практикуються в останніх дослідженнях середньовічної філософії й теології, можуть бути схематично розміщені всередині цієї загальної системи, яка складається з аргументативної, фокусної (або «об’єктної») і (кон)текстуальної осей, перетин яких ототожнюється з тим, що деякі вчені називають «інтегральною» моделлю студій. Цей пояснювальний інструмент дозволяє побачити, як сучасні підходи й методи утворю-ють кілька осей, що складаються в одну складну сітку, і допомагає наочно відобразити спектр підходів, наявних у філософській історіографії Середніх віків.uk
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherВНТУuk
dc.relation.ispartofSententiae. № 2 : 8-28.en
dc.relation.urihttps://sententiae.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/sententiae/article/view/527
dc.subjectісторичне дослідженняuk
dc.subjectсистематичне дослідженняuk
dc.subjectсередньовічна думкаuk
dc.subjectметодологічні цінностіuk
dc.subjectфілософська історіографіяuk
dc.titleA system of methodological coordinates for a historiographer of medieval philosophy: a proposal of an explanatory toolen
dc.title.alternativeСистема методологічних координат для історіографа середньовічної фі-лософії: пропозиція щодо тлумачного інструментуuk
dc.typeArticle
dc.relation.referencesAdamson, P. (2007). Al-Kindī. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780195181425.001.0001en
dc.relation.referencesAdamson, P. (2017). The Arabic Plotinus: A philosophical study of the “Theology of Aristotle.” Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press.en
dc.relation.referencesAertsen, J. A. (1996). Medieval philosophy and the transcendentals: The case of Thomas Aquinas. Leiden, etc.: Brill.en
dc.relation.referencesAertsen, J. A., Emery, Jr., K., & Speer, A. (Eds.). (2001). Nach der Verurteilung von 1277: Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts: Studien und Texte / After the Condemnation of 1277. Philosophy and Theology at the University of Paris in the Last Quarter of the Thirteenth Century. Studies and Texts. Berlin, & New York: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820577en
dc.relation.referencesAertsen, J. A., & Speer, A. (Eds.). (1998). Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Qu’est-ce que la philosophie au Moyen Âge? What is Philosophy in the Middle Ages? Akten des X. Internationalen Kongresses für Mittelalterliche Philosophie der Société Internationale pour l’Etude de la Philosophie Médiévale, 25. bis 30. August 1997 in Erfurt. Berlin, & New York: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110801453en
dc.relation.referencesAlexander, J. (2016). The Cambridge School, c. 1875 to 1975. History of Political Thought, 37(2), 360-386.en
dc.relation.referencesAllison, G. R. (2011). Historical theology: An introduction to Christian doctrine; a companion to Wayne Grudem’s Systematic theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.en
dc.relation.referencesArchambault, J. (2014). Aquinas, the a priori/a posteriori distinction, and the Kantian dependency thesis. Religious Studies, 50(2), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412513000292en
dc.relation.referencesAurell, J. (2005). Introduction: Medievalism and Medievalists in the 20th century. In J. Aurell & F. Crosas (Eds.), Rewriting the Middle Ages in the twentieth century (pp. 9-23). Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.STMH-EB.3.4460en
dc.relation.referencesAurell, J. (2009). Introduction: Modern Medievalism and National Traditions. In J. Aurell, & J. Pavón Benito (Eds.), Rewriting the Middle Ages in the twentieth century II: National traditions (pp. 9-13). Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.STMH-EB.3.2396en
dc.relation.referencesAurell, J., & Crosas, F. (Eds.). (2005). Rewriting the Middle Ages in the twentieth century. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.BOOKS.6.09070802050003050107010903en
dc.relation.referencesAurell, J., & Pavón Benito, J. (Eds.). (2009). Rewriting the Middle Ages in the twentieth century II: National traditions. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.BOOKS.6.09070802050003050301040401en
dc.relation.referencesBackus, I. (Ed.). (1997). The reception of the church fathers in the West: From the Carolingians to the Maurists (Vol. 1-2). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391673en
dc.relation.referencesBavaj, R. (2010, September 13). Intellectual History. Docupedia-Zeitgeschichte. Retrieved from http://docupedia.de/zg/bavaj_intellectual_history_v1_en_2010en
dc.relation.referencesBeiser, F. (2007). Historicism. In M. Rosen, & B. Leiter (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Continental Philosophy (pp. 155-179). New York: Oxford University Press.en
dc.relation.referencesBenevich, F. (2018). Essentialität und Notwendigkeit: Avicenna und die Aristotelische Tradition. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004380028en
dc.relation.referencesBevir, M. (1992). The Errors of Linguistic Contextualism. History and Theory, 31(3), 276-298. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505371en
dc.relation.referencesBianchi, L. (1999). Censure et liberté intellectuelle à l’Université de Paris (XIIIe-XIVe siècles). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.en
dc.relation.referencesBianchi, L. (2000). Testi e contesti nel “nuovo medievismo” italiano. In E. Donaggio & E. Pasini (Eds.), Cinquant’anni di storiografia filosofica in Italia: Ommaggio a Carlo Viano [congresso torinese dal 19 al 22 ottobre 1999] (pp. 109-122). Bologna: Il Mulino.en
dc.relation.referencesBloch, R. H., Calhoun, A., Cerquiglini-Toulet, J., Küpper, J., & Patterson, J. (Eds.). (2014). Rethinking the New Medievalism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.en
dc.relation.referencesBoiadzhiev, T., Kapriev, G., & Speer, A. (Eds.). (2000). Die Dionysius-Rezeption im Mittelalter: Internationales Kolloquium in Sofia vom 8. Bis 11. April 1999 unter der Schirmherrschaft der Société internationale pour l’étude de la philosophie médiévale. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.6.09070802050003050101010804en
dc.relation.referencesBose, M. (2006). The intellectual history of the middle ages. In R. Whatmore, & B. Young (Eds.), Palgrave Advances in Intellectual History (pp. 92-108). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230204300_6en
dc.relation.referencesBoulnois, O. (1999). Être et représentation: Une généalogie de la métaphysique moderne à l’époque de Duns Scot (XIIIe-XIVe siècle). Paris: PUF. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.bouln.1999.01en
dc.relation.referencesBoulnois, O. (2007). Généalogies du sujet: De Saint Anselme à Malebranche. Paris: Vrin.en
dc.relation.referencesBoulnois, O. (2014). Lire le Principe d’individuation de Duns Scot. Paris: Vrin.en
dc.relation.referencesBradley, J. E., & Muller, R. A. (2016). Church History: An Introduction to Research Methods and Resources (Second edition). Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge: Eerdmans.en
dc.relation.referencesBradshaw, D. (2006). Aristotle East and West: Metaphysics and the Division of Christendom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.relation.referencesBrock, S. L. (2015). The Philosophy of Saint Thomas Aquinas: A Sketch. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1p5f24sen
dc.relation.referencesBrownlee, M. S., Brownlee, K., & Nichols, S. G. (Eds.). (1991). The new medievalism. Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press.en
dc.relation.referencesBrun, M. (2005). Die Trinitarische Theologie bei Bonaventura: Ihr Ursprung bei Dionysius Pseudo-Areopagita und Richard von St.-Victor. Norderstedt: GRIN Verlag.en
dc.relation.referencesBubert, M. (2019). Kreative Gegensätze: Der Streit um den Nutzen der Philosophie an der mittelalterlichen Pariser Universität. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004399518en
dc.relation.referencesButterworth, C. E., & Kessel, B. A. (Eds.). (1994). The Introduction of Arabic Philosophy into Europe. Leiden, etc.: Brill. https://brill.com/view/title/2296en
dc.relation.referencesCampbell, R. (2018). Rethinking Anselm’s Arguments. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004363663en
dc.relation.referencesCantor, N. F. (1991). Inventing the Middle Ages: The Lives, Works, And Ideas Of The Great Medievalists of the Twentieth Century. New York, NY: William Morrow and Company.en
dc.relation.referencesCatalani, L., & De Filippis, R. (Eds.). (2018). Anselmo d’Aosta e il pensiero monastico medievale: Atti del XVIII Convengo Internazionale di studi della Societa Italiana per lo Studio de Pensiero Medievale (SISPM) (Cava de’ Tirreni – Fisciano, 5-8 dicembre 2009). Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.NUTRIX-EB.5.106137en
dc.relation.referencesChapman, A., Coffey, J., & Gregory, B. S. (Eds.). (2009). Seeing things their way: Intellectual history and the return of religion. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.en
dc.relation.referencesColish, M. L. (1994). Peter Lombard (Vol. 1-2). Leiden, etc.: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004246904en
dc.relation.referencesColish, M. L. (2000). Remapping Scholasticism. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. http://www.pims.ca/pdf/colish2000.pdfen
dc.relation.referencesCollini, S. (2016). The Identity of Intellectual History. In R. Whatmore, & B. Young (Eds.), A companion to intellectual history (pp. 7-18). Malden, MA, & Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118508091.ch1en
dc.relation.referencesCoolman, B. T. (2010). The theology of Hugh of St. Victor: An interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.relation.referencesCoolman, B. T. (2017). Knowledge, Love, and Ecstasy in the Theology of Thomas Gallus. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601769.001.0001en
dc.relation.referencesCourtenay, W. J. (2008). Ockham and Ockhamism: Studies in the dissemination and impact of his thought. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004168305.i-420en
dc.relation.referencesCourtenay, W. J., Miethke, J., & Priest, D. B. (Eds.). (2000). University and schooling in medieval society. Leiden, etc.: Brill.en
dc.relation.referencesCraig, W. L. (1988). The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents from Aristotle to Suarez. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004246560en
dc.relation.referencesCraig, W. L. (1991). Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom: The Coherence of Theism: Omniscience. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004246683en
dc.relation.referencesDamico, H. (Ed.). (2000). Philosophy and the Arts (Vol. 3). New York, NY: Garland Publishing.en
dc.relation.referencesD’Amico, R. (2008). Historicism. In A. Tucker (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of history and historiography (pp. 243-252). Malden, MA, & Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304916.ch21en
dc.relation.referencesRidder-Symoens, H. de.(Ed.). (1992). Universities in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.relation.referencesDeHart, P. J. (2012). Aquinas and radical orthodoxy: A critical inquiry. New York, & London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203153055en
dc.relation.referencesdel Punta, F. (1998). The Genre of Commentaries in Middle Ages and its Relation to the Nature and Originality of Medieval Thought. In J. A. Aertsen, & A. Speer (Eds.), Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Qu’est-ce que la philosophie au Moyen Âge? What is Philosophy in the Middle Ages? Akten des X. Internationalen Kongresses für Mittelalterliche Philosophie der Société Internationale pour l’Etude de la Philosophie Médiévale, 25. Bis 30. August 1997 in Erfurt (pp. 138-151). Berlin, & New York: De Gruyter.en
dc.relation.referencesBok, N. W. den. (1996). Communicating the Most High: A Systematic Study of Person and Trinity in the Theology of Richard of St. Victor (†1173). [Turnhout, & Paris]: Brepols.en
dc.relation.referencesDewan, L. (2006). Form and being: Studies in Thomistic metaphysics. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.en
dc.relation.referencesDuba, W. O. (2017). The forge of doctrine: The academic year 1330-31 and the rise of scotism at the University of Paris. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SSENT-EB.5.112386en
dc.relation.referencesEder, G., & Ramharter, E. (2015). Formal reconstructions of St. Anselm’s ontological argument. Synthese, 192(9), 2795-2825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0682-8en
dc.relation.referencesElders, L. J. (2018). Thomas Aquinas and his predecessors: The philosophers and the church fathers in his work. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv8j74ren
dc.relation.referencesEmery, G., & Levering, M. (Eds.). (2015). Aristotle in Aquinas’s theology. New York, NY, & Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198749639.001.0001en
dc.relation.referencesEmery, K., Courtenay, W. J., & Metzger, S. M. (Eds.). (2012). Philosophy and Theology in the Studia of the Religious Orders and at Papal and Royal Courts. Acts of the XVth Annual Colloquium of the Société Internationale pour l’Étude de la Philosophie Médiévale, University of Notre Dame, 8-10 October 2008. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.6.09070802050003050403020600en
dc.relation.referencesEvans, G. R., & Rosemann, P. W. (Eds.). (2002-2015). Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard (Vol. 1-3). Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004283046en
dc.relation.referencesFeiss, H., & Mousseau, J. (Eds.). (2017). A companion to the Abbey of Saint Victor in Paris. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004351691en
dc.relation.referencesFlasch, K. (1987). Einführung in die Philosophie des Mittelalters. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.en
dc.relation.referencesFlasch, K. (2008). Prendre congé de Dilthey; Que serait un néohistorisme en histoire de la philosophie?; suivi de: Congé à Dilthey (F. Gregorio, & C. König-Pralong, Trans.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.en
dc.relation.referencesFlasch, K. (2013). Das philosophische Denken im Mittelalter: Von Augustin zu Machiavelli (Dritte, vollständig durchgesehene und erweiterte Auflage). Stuttgart: Reclam.en
dc.relation.referencesFrame, J. M. (2015). A history of Western philosophy and theology. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing.en
dc.relation.referencesFriedman, R. L. (2002). The Sentences Commentary, 1250-1320: General Trends, the Impact of the Religious Orders, and the Test Case of Predestination. In G. R. Evans (Ed.), Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard (Vol. 1, pp. 41-128). Leiden, etc.: Brill.en
dc.relation.referencesFriedman, R. L. (2013). Intellectual traditions at the medieval university: The use of philosophical psychology in Trinitarian theology among the Franciscans and Dominicans, 1250-1350 (Vol. 1-2). Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004231986en
dc.relation.referencesFriedman, R. L., & Nielsen, L. O. (Eds.). (2010). The Medieval Heritage in Early Modern Metaphysics and Modal Theory, 1400-1700. Dordrecht, & Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.en
dc.relation.referencesGalluzzo, G. (2013). The Medieval Reception of Book Zeta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004235021en
dc.relation.referencesGalluzzo, G., & Amerini, F. (Eds.). (2014). A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004261297en
dc.relation.referencesGasper, G. E. M. (2004). Anselm of Canterbury and his Theological Inheritance. Aldershot: Ashgate.en
dc.relation.referencesGelber, H. G. (2004). It Could Have Been Otherwise: Contingency and Necessity in Dominican Theology at Oxford, 1300-1350. Leiden, & Boston: Brill.en
dc.relation.referencesGilli, P., Verger, J., & Le Blévec, D. (Eds.). (2007). Les universités et la ville au moyen age: Cohabitation et tension. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004158764.i-373en
dc.relation.referencesGilson, É. (1955). History of Christian philosophy in the Middle Ages (7th printing). New York, NY: Random House.en
dc.relation.referencesGilson, É. (1969). L’esprit de la philosophie médiévale: Gifford Lectures (Université d’Aberdeen) [1931] (2. éd. rev.). Paris: Vrin.en
dc.relation.referencesGorochov, N. (2012). Naissance de l’université: Les écoles de Paris d’Innocent III à Thomas d’Aquin (v. 1200 - v. 1245). Paris: Champion.en
dc.relation.referencesHammond, J. M., Hellmann, J. A. W., & Goff, J. (Eds.). (2014). A Companion to Bonaventure. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004260733en
dc.relation.referencesHemming, L. P. (2002). Heidegger’s Atheism: The Refusal of a Theological Voice. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.en
dc.relation.referencesHoenen, M. J. F. M. (1993). Marsilius of Inghen: Divine Knowledge in Late Medieval Thought. Leiden, etc.: Brill.en
dc.relation.referencesHoenen, M. J. F. M., & Nauta, L. (Eds.). (1997). Boethius in the Middle Ages: Latin and Vernacular Traditions of the Consolatio Philosophiae. Leiden, etc.: Brill.en
dc.relation.referencesHoenen, M. J. F. M., Schneider, J. J. H., & Wieland, G. (Eds.). (1995). Philosophy and learning: Universities in the Middle Ages. Leiden, etc.: Brill.en
dc.relation.referencesHonnefelder, L. (1990). Scientia transcendens: Die formale Bestimmung der Seiendheit und Realität in der Metaphysik des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit (Duns Scotus-Suárez-Wolff-Kant-Peirce). Hamburg: Felix Meiner. https://doi.org/10.28937/978-3-7873-2560-3en
dc.relation.referencesHonnefelder, L. (1998). Metaphysik zwischen Onto-Theologik, Transzendentalwissenschaft und universaler formaler Semantik. Zur philosophischen Aktualität der mittelalterlichen Ansätze von Metaphysik. In J. A. Aertsen, & A. Speer (Eds.), Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Qu’est-ce que la philosophie au Moyen Âge? What is Philosophy in the Middle Ages? (pp. 48-59). Berlin, & New York: De Gruyter.en
dc.relation.referencesHonnefelder, L. (2008). Woher kommen wir? Ursprünge der Moderne im Denken des Mittelalters. Berlin: Berlin University Press.en
dc.relation.referencesHonnefelder, L., Wood, R., Dreyer, M., & Aris, M.-A. (Eds.). (2005). Albertus Magnus und die Anfänge der Aristoteles-Rezeption im lateinischen Mittelalter: Von Richardus Rufus bis zu Franciscus de Mayronis / Albertus Magnus and the beginnings of the medieval reception of Aristotle in the Latin West: From Richardus Rufus to Franciscus de Mayronis. Münster: Aschendorff.en
dc.relation.referencesHovorun, C. (2015). Meta-Ecclesiology: Chronicles on Church Awareness. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137543936en
dc.relation.referencesImbach, R. (1996). Dante, la philosophie et les laïcs. Ed. universitaires; Paris: Ed. du Cerf.en
dc.relation.referencesImbach, R., & König-Pralong, C. (2013). Le défi laïque: Existe-t-il une philosophie de laïcs au Moyen Âge? Paris: Vrin.en
dc.relation.referencesInglis, J. (1998). Spheres of philosophical inquiry and the historiography of medieval philosophy. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004247352en
dc.relation.referencesJames, S. (2018). J.G.A. Pocock and the idea of the ‘Cambridge School’ in the history of political thought. History of European Ideas, 45, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2018.1498011en
dc.relation.referencesJolivet, J. (1991). Les études de philosophie médiévale en France de Victor Cousin à Étienne Gilson. In R. Imbach, & A. Maierù (Eds.), Gli studi di filosofia medievale fra Otto e Novecento: Contributo a un bilancio storiografico. Atti del convegno internazionale, Roma, 21-23 settembre 1989 (pp. 1- 20). Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.en
dc.relation.referencesKapriev, G. (1998). Ipsa Vita et Veritas: Der “ontologische Gottesbeweis” und die Ideenwelt Anselms von Canterbury. Leiden, & Boston: Brill.en
dc.relation.referencesKaylor, N. H., & Phillips, P. E. (Eds.). (2012). A Companion to Boethius in the Middle Ages. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004225381en
dc.relation.referencesKenny, A. (1993). Aquinas on mind. New York, NY; London: Routledge.en
dc.relation.referencesKenny, A. (2005). Medieval Philosophy (Vol. 2). Oxford: Clarendon Press.en
dc.relation.referencesKitanov, S. (2014). Beatific Enjoyment in Medieval Scholastic Debates: The Complex Legacy of Saint Augustine and Peter Lombard. New York, NY: Lexington Books.en
dc.relation.referencesKnuuttila, S. (1993). Modalities in Medieval Philosophy. London, & New York: Routledge.en
dc.relation.referencesKnuuttila, S. (2017). Medieval Theories of Modality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (June 30, 1999; substantive revision Apr 19, 2017). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ modality-medieval/en
dc.relation.referencesKoikkalainen, P. (2011). Contextualist dilemmas: Methodology of the history of political theory in two stages. History of European Ideas, 37, 315-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2010.10.010en
dc.relation.referencesKönig-Pralong, C. (2009). L’histoire de la philosophie médiévale depuis 1950: Méthodes, textes, débats. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 64(1), 143-169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0395264900028602en
dc.relation.referencesKretzmann, N. (1997). The metaphysics of theism: Aquinas’s natural theology in Summa contra gentiles I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.en
dc.relation.referencesKretzmann, N. (1998). The metaphysics of creation: Aquinas’s natural theology in Summa contra gentiles II. Oxford, & New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.en
dc.relation.referencesKüng, H. (1994). Große christliche Denker. München: Piper.en
dc.relation.referencesLafleur, C., & Carrier, J. (Eds.). (1997). L’enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle: Autour du “Guide de l’etudiant” du ms. Ripoll 109: Actes du colloque international. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SA-EB.5.106202en
dc.relation.referencesLagerlund, H. (2008). The Assimilation of Aristotelian and Arabic Logic up to the Later Thirteenth Century. In D. M. Gabbay, & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Vol. 2, Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic (pp. 281-346). Amsterdam, & London: Elsevier North Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-5857(08)80026-Xen
dc.relation.referencesLamb, R. (2009). Quentin Skinner’s revised historical contextualism: A critique. History of the Human Sciences, 22(3), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695109104423en
dc.relation.referencesLe Goff, J. (1985). Les intellectuels au Moyen Âge. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.en
dc.relation.referencesLéchot, P.-O. (Ed.). (2018). Introduction à l’histoire de la théologie. Genève: Labor et Fides.en
dc.relation.referencesLeinsle, U. G. (1995). Einführung in die scholastische Theologie. Paderborn: Schöningh.en
dc.relation.referencesLeinsle, U. G. (2010). Introduction to Scholastic Theology (M. J. Miller, Trans.). Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.en
dc.relation.referencesLevering, M., & Plested, M. (Eds.). (2021). The Oxford Handbook of the Reception of Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.relation.referencesLibera, A. de. (1991a). Les études de philosophie médiévale en France d’Étienne Gilson à nos jours. In R. Imbach, & A. Maierù (Eds.), Gli studi di filosofia medievale fra Otto e Novecento: Contributo a un bilancio storiografico. Atti del convegno internazionale, Roma, 21-23 settembre 1989 (pp. 21- 50). Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.en
dc.relation.referencesLibera, A. de. (1991b). Penser au Moyen Âge. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.en
dc.relation.referencesLibera, A. de. (1999). Le relativisme historique: Théorie des “des complexes questions-réponses” et “traçabilite.” Études philosophiques, 4, 479-494.en
dc.relation.referencesLibera, A. de. (2014). Où va la philosophie médiévale? Paris: Fayard; Collège de France. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.cdf.3634en
dc.relation.referencesLibera, A. de. (2016). L’Archéologie philosophique: Séminaire du Collège de France, 2013-2014. Paris: Vrin.en
dc.relation.referencesLibera, A. de. (2019). Philosophie médiévale. Paris: PUF.en
dc.relation.referencesLuscombe, D. E. (1991). The study of medieval philosophy in England in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: An initial appraisal. In R. Imbach, & A. Maierù (Eds.), Gli studi di filosofia medievale fra Otto e Novecento: Contributo a un bilancio storiografico. Atti del convegno internazionale, Roma, 21-23 settembre 1989 (pp. 131-140). Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.en
dc.relation.referencesMacDonald, S. (1993). Theory of Knowledge. In N. Kretzmann, & E. Stump (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas (pp. 160-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521431956.007en
dc.relation.referencesMaierù, A. (1994). University training in medieval Europe (D. N. Pryds, Ed. & Trans.). Leiden, etc.: Brill.en
dc.relation.referencesMaierù, A., & Valente, L. (Eds.). (2004). Medieval theories on assertive and non-assertive language. Acts of the 14th European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics. Florence: Olschki.en
dc.relation.referencesMarenbon, J. (1997). The Philosophy of Peter Abelard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511582714en
dc.relation.referencesMarenbon, J. (1998). Introduction. In J. Marenbon (Ed.), Medieval Philosophy (pp. 1-10). London: Routledge.en
dc.relation.referencesMarenbon, J. (2003). Boethius. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195134079.001.0001en
dc.relation.referencesMarenbon, J. (2007). Medieval Philosophy: An Historical and Philosophical Introduction. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203968765en
dc.relation.referencesMarenbon, J. (2011). Why study medieval philosophy? In M. van Ackeren, T. Kobusch, & J. Müller (Eds.), Warum noch Philosophie?: Historische, systematische und gesellschaftliche Positionen (pp. 60-73). Berlin, & Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223767.65en
dc.relation.referencesMarenbon, J. (2013). Abelard in Four Dimensions: A Twelfth-Century Philosopher in His Context and Ours. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.en
dc.relation.referencesMarenbon, J. (2018). Why We Need a Real History of Philosophy. In M. van Ackeren, & L. Klein (Eds.), Philosophy and the historical perspective (pp. 36-50). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266298.003.0003en
dc.relation.referencesMarenbon, J. (Ed.). (2020). King’s Hall, Cambridge and the Fourteenth-Century Universities: New Perspectives. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004435056en
dc.relation.referencesMarion, J.-L. (1982). Dieu sans l’étre: Hors-texte. Paris: Fayard.en
dc.relation.referencesMarion, J.-L. (2002). Dieu sans l’étre: Hors-texte (2éme édition). Paris: Quadrige; PUF.en
dc.relation.referencesMarmursztejn, E. (2007). L’autorité des maîtres: Scolastique, normes et société au XIIIe siècle. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.en
dc.relation.referencesMcCord Adams, M. (2010). Some Later Medieval Theories of the Eucharist: Thomas Aquinas, Giles of Rome, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591053.001.0001en
dc.relation.referencesMcCosker, P., & Turner, D. (Eds.). (2016). The Cambridge Companion to the Summa Theologiae. New York, & Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139034159en
dc.relation.referencesMcGrade, A. S. (Ed.). (2003). The Cambridge companion to medieval philosophy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521806038en
dc.relation.referencesMcIntyre, A. (1990). Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopaedia, Genealogy, and Tradition: Gifford lectures delivered in the University of Edinburgh in 1988. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.en
dc.relation.referencesMcIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (3rd edition). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.en
dc.relation.referencesMilbank, J. (2006). Theology and social theory: Beyond secular reason (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694121en
dc.relation.referencesMilbank, J. (2019). Afterword: The Dissolution of Divine Government: Gilson and the “Scotus Story.” In J. G. Colbert (Trans.), John Duns Scotus: Introduction to his fundamental positions (pp. 538-576). London, etc.: T & T Clark.en
dc.relation.referencesMilbank, J., & Pickstock, C. (2001). Truth in Aquinas. London, & New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203467923en
dc.relation.referencesMulchahey, M. M. (1998). “First the Bow is Bent in Study...”: Dominican Education before 1350. Toronto: Pontifical Institute for Medieval Studies.en
dc.relation.referencesNewton, L. (Ed.). (2008). Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004167520.I-441en
dc.relation.referencesNoone, T. B. (2001). Medieval Scholarship and Philosophy in the Last One Hundred Years. In B. J. Shanley (Ed.), One Hundred Years of Philosophy (pp. 111-132). Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcj2n9s.9en
dc.relation.referencesNormore, C. G. (1990). Doxology and the History of Philosophy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 16, 203-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1990.10717226en
dc.relation.referencesNovikoff, A. J. (2013). The medieval culture of disputation: Pedagogy, practice, and performance. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812208634en
dc.relation.referencesOexle, O. G. (2001). L’historisme en débat: De Nietzsche à Kantorowicz. Paris: Aubier.en
dc.relation.referencesOliva, A. (2006). Les débuts de l’enseignement de Thomas d’Aquin et sa conception de la Sacra Doctrina, avec l’édition du prologue de son Commentaire des Sentences. Paris: Vrin.en
dc.relation.referencesOppy, G. (1995). Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663840en
dc.relation.referencesOsborne, K. B. (Ed.). (2007). The history of Franciscan theology. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute; St. Bonaventure University.en
dc.relation.referencesOtten, W., & Pollmann, K. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford guide to the historical reception of Augustine (Vol. 1-3). Oxford, & New York: Oxford University Press.en
dc.relation.referencesPacheco, M. C. (Ed.). (1999). Le vocabulaire des écoles des Mendiants au moyen âge: Actes du colloque de Porto (Portugal), 11-12 octobre 1996. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CIVIEB. 6.09070802050003050008000203en
dc.relation.referencesPanaccio, C. (1998). La référence transtemporelle et l’étude de la philosophie médiévale. In J. A. Aertsen, & A. Speer (Eds.), Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Qu’est-ce que la philosophie au Moyen Âge? What is Philosophy in the Middle Ages? (pp. 360-367). Berlin, & New York: De Gruyter.en
dc.relation.referencesPanaccio, C. (2000). Philosophie analytique et histoire de la philosophie. In P. Engel (Ed.), Précis de philosophie analytique (pp. 325-344). Paris: PUF.en
dc.relation.referencesPanaccio, C. (2019). Récit et reconstruction: Les fondements de la méthode en histoire de la philosophie. Paris: Vrin.en
dc.relation.referencesPerler, D. (2004). Theorien der intentionalität im Mittelalter (2. durchgesehene Auflage). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. https://doi.org/10.3196/9783465032892en
dc.relation.referencesPerler, D. (2012). Zweifel und Gewissheit: Skeptische Debatten im Mittelalter (2. durchgesehene Auflage). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.en
dc.relation.referencesPlourde, J. (2019). Histoire de la philosophie, historiographie et philosophie: Réflexions critiques au sujet de la portée de la thèse de la pertinence philosophique de l’histoire de la philosophie. Philosophiques, 46(2), 381-393. https://doi.org/10.7202/1066777aren
dc.relation.referencesPohl, B., & Gathagan, L. L. (Eds.). (2017). A companion to the Abbey of Le Bec in the Central Middle Ages (11th-13th centuries). Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004351905en
dc.relation.referencesPomplun, R. T. (2016). John Duns Scotus in the History of Medieval Philosophy from the Sixteenth Century to Étienne Gilson (†1978). Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 58, 355-445. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.BPM.5.113344en
dc.relation.referencesPorro, P. (2012). Tommaso d’Aquino: Un profilo storico-filosofico. Roma: Carocci.en
dc.relation.referencesPorro, P. (2015). Thomas Aquinas: A historical and philosophical profile (R. W. Nutt, & J. G. Trabbic, Trans.). Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.en
dc.relation.referencesPosti, M. (2020). Medieval Theories of Divine Providence 1250-1350. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004429727en
dc.relation.referencesPutallaz, F.-X. (1997). Figures franciscaines. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.en
dc.relation.referencesRée, J. (1978). Philosophy and the History of Philosophy. In J. Rée, M. Ayers, & A. Westoby, Philosophy and Its Past (pp. 1-39). Hassocks, Sussex: The Harvester Press.en
dc.relation.referencesReisman, D. C. (2002). The Making of the Avicennan Tradition: The Transmission, Contents, and Structure of Ibn Sīnā’s al-Mubāḥaṭāt (The Discussions). Leiden, etc.: Brill.en
dc.relation.referencesRichter, M. (2003). Towards a Lexicon of European Political and Legal Concepts: A Comparison of Begriffsgeschichte and the “Cambridge School.” Critical Review of International Political and Social Philosophy, 6(2), 91-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230510001702773en
dc.relation.referencesRoest, B. (2000). A history of Franciscan education (c. 1210-1517). Leiden, etc.: Brill.en
dc.relation.referencesRoest, B. (2015). Franciscan Learning, Preaching and Mission c. 1220-1650: Cum scientia sit donum Dei, armatura ad defendendam sanctam fidem catholicam... Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004280731en
dc.relation.referencesRogers, K. A. (2007). The Necessity of the Present and Anselm’s Eternalist Response to the Problem of Theological Fatalism. Religious Studies, 43(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412506008742en
dc.relation.referencesRogers, K. A. (2008). Anselm on freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199231676.001.0001en
dc.relation.referencesRogers, K. A. (2015). Freedom and self-creation: Anselmian libertarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198743972.001.0001en
dc.relation.referencesRorty, R. (1984). The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres. In R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, & Q. Skinner (Eds.), Philosophy in History: Essays in the Historiography of Philosophy (pp. 49-76). Cambridge, & New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625534.006en
dc.relation.referencesRosemann, P. W. (1999). Introduction: A Change of Paradigm in the Study of Medieval Thought: From Rationalism to Postmodernism. In P. W. Rosemann, Understanding Scholastic Thought with Foucault (pp. 1-17). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.en
dc.relation.referencesRosemann, P. W. (2004). Peter Lombard. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195155440.001.0001en
dc.relation.referencesRosemann, P. W. (2007). The Story of a Great Medieval Book: Peter Lombard’s Sentences. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.en
dc.relation.referencesSchabel, C. (Ed.). (2006). Theological quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The thirteenth century. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047404149en
dc.relation.referencesSchabel, C. (Ed.). (2007). Theological quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The fourteenth century. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004162884.i-793en
dc.relation.referencesSchumacher, L. (2019). Early Franciscan theology: Between authority and innovation. New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595087en
dc.relation.referencesSchumacher, L. (Ed.). (2020a). The Summa Halensis: Doctrines and Debates. Berlin, & Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685008en
dc.relation.referencesSchumacher, L. (Ed.). (2020b). The Summa Halensis: Sources and Context. Berlin, & Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022en
dc.relation.referencesSchweitzer, D. (2007). Aspects of God’s relationship to the world in the theologies of Jürgen Moltmann, Bonaventure and Jonathan Edwards. Religious Studies and Theology, 26(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.v26i1.5en
dc.relation.referencesSilva, R. (2010). O contextualismo linguístico na história do pensamento político: Quentin Skinner e o debate metodológico contemporâneo [Linguistic contextualism in the history of politic thought: Quentin Skinner and the contemporary methodological debate]. Dados, 53(2), 299-335. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582010000200002en
dc.relation.referencesSkinner, Q. (2002). Visions of Politics. Volume 1: Regarding Method. New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.relation.referencesSmith, A. D. (2014). Anselm’s Other Argument. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674726000en
dc.relation.referencesSmith, G. R. (2013). The Problem of Divine Attributes from Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus [Ph.D. Dissertation]. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame (Graduate Program in Medieval Studies).en
dc.relation.referencesSouthern, R. W. (1990). Saint Anselm: A Portrait in a Landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.relation.referencesSouthern, R. W. (1995). Scholastic Humanism and the Unification of Europe (Vol. 1-2). (L. Smith, & B. Ward, Eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.en
dc.relation.referencesSouthern, R. W. (2001). The Heroic Age (Vol. 2). (L. Smith, & B. Ward, Eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.en
dc.relation.referencesStump, E. (2001). Augustine on free will. In E. Stump, & N. Kretzmann (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Augustine (pp. 124-147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521650186.011en
dc.relation.referencesStump, E. (2003). Aquinas. London, & New York: Routledge.en
dc.relation.referencesStump, E. (2014). Augustine on free will. In D. V. Meconi, & E. Stump (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Augustine (2nd ed., pp. 166-186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139178044.014en
dc.relation.referencesSweeney, E. C. (2012). Anselm of Canterbury and the Desire for the Word. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt2852r7en
dc.relation.referencesVelde, R. T. te. (2013). The Doctrine of God in Reformed Orthodoxy, Karl Barth, and the Utrecht School: A Study in Method and Content. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004252462en
dc.relation.referencesTeeuwen, M. (2003). The Vocabulary of Intellectual Life in the Middle Ages. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CIVI-EB.5.105931en
dc.relation.referencesTribe, K. (2016). Intellectual History as Begriffsgeschichte. In R. Whatmore, & B. Young (Eds.), A companion to intellectual history (pp. 61-71). Malden, MA; Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118508091.ch5en
dc.relation.referencesTurner, D. (2004). Faith, reason, and the existence of God. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617317en
dc.relation.referencesVan Steenberghen, F. (1991). La philosophie au XIIIe siècle (2e éd.). Louvain-la-Neuve: Éditions de l’Institut Superieur de Philosophie.en
dc.relation.referencesVan Steenberghen, F. (1992). Le thomisme (2e éd.). Pari: PUF.en
dc.relation.referencesVerger, J. (1995). Les universités françaises au Moyen Age. Leiden: Brill.en
dc.relation.referencesVerger, J. (1998). Les gens de savoir dans l’Europe de la fin du Moyen Âge. Paris: PUF. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.verge.1998.01en
dc.relation.referencesVisser, S., & Williams, T. (2009). Anselm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780195309386.001.0001en
dc.relation.referencesVos, A. (2001). Scholasticism and Reformation. In W. J. van Asselt, & E. Dekker (Eds.), Reformation and Scholasticism. An Ecumenical Enterprise (pp. 99-119). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.en
dc.relation.referencesVos, A. (2006). The Philosophy of John Duns Scotus. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748624621.001.0001en
dc.relation.referencesVos, A. (2010). Scotus’ Significance for Western Philosophy and Theology. In F. Fiorentino (Ed.), Lo scotismo nel mezzogiorno d’Italia: Atti del Congresso internazionale (Bitonto 25-28 marzo 2008) in occasione del VII centenario della morte di Giovanni Duns Scoto (pp. 173-209). Porto: Fédération Internationale des Instituts d’Études Médiévales. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.TEMA-EB.4.00818en
dc.relation.referencesVos, A. (2018). The Theology of John Duns Scotus. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004360235en
dc.relation.referencesVos, A., Veldhuis, H., Looman-Graaskamp, A. H., Dekker, E., & den Bok, N. W. (1994). John Duns Scotus. Contingency and Freedom. Lectura I 39. Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Dordrecht, etc.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.en
dc.relation.referencesWei, I. P. (2012). Intellectual culture in medieval Paris: Theologians and the university, c.1100-1330. New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511842108en
dc.relation.referencesWeijers, O. (2002). La “disputatio” dans les Facultés des arts au Moyen Âge. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SA-EB.5.106207en
dc.relation.referencesWeijers, O. (Ed.). (2009). Queritur utrum: Recherches sur la ‘disputatio’ dans les universités médiévales. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SA-EB.5.106217en
dc.relation.referencesWeijers, O. (2013). In Search of the Truth: A History of Disputation Techniques from Antiquity to Early Modern Times. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SFAHI-EB.5.112315en
dc.relation.referencesWeijers, O. (2015). A Scholar’s Paradise: Teaching and Debating in Medieval Paris. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SFAHI-EB.5.112316en
dc.relation.referencesWeijers, O., & Verger, J. (Eds.). (2013). Les débuts de l’enseignement universitaire à Paris (1200-1245 environ). Turnhout: Brepols.en
dc.relation.referencesWhatmore, R. (2015). Cambridge School of Intellectual History. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 61-65). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.61171-6en
dc.relation.referencesWhatmore, R. (2016). What is intellectual history? Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity.en
dc.relation.referencesWhatmore, R., & Young, B. (Eds.). (2006). Palgrave Advances in Intellectual History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230204300en
dc.relation.referencesWhatmore, R., & Young, B. (Eds.). (2016). A companion to intellectual history. Malden, MA; Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.en
dc.relation.referencesWickberg, D. (2014). In the environment of ideas: Arthur Lovejoy and the history of ideas as a form of cultural history. Modern Intellectual History, 11(2), 439-464. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244314000080en
dc.relation.referencesWielockx, R. (1991). De Mercier à De Wulf. Débuts de l’«École de Louvain». In R. Imbach, & A. Maierù (Eds.), Gli studi di filosofia medievale fra Otto e Novecento: Contributo a un bilancio storiografico. Atti del convegno internazionale, Roma, 21-23 settembre 1989 (pp. 75-96). Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.en
dc.relation.referencesWippel, J. F. (2000). The metaphysical thought of Thomas Aquinas: From finite being to uncreated being. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.en
dc.relation.referencesWippel, J. F. (2007). Metaphysical themes in Thomas Aquinas II. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.en
dc.relation.referencesYoung, S. E. (2014). Scholarly Community at the Early University of Paris: Theologians, Education and Society, 1215-1248. New York, NY; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381178en
dc.relation.referencesZarka, Y. C. (2001). Que nous emporte l’histoire de la philosophie? Essai inédit. In Y. C. Zarka (Ed.), Comment écrire l’histoire de la philosophie? (pp. 19-31). Paris: PUF.en
dc.relation.referencesZarka, Y. C. (2005). The Ideology of Context: Uses and Abuses of Context in the Historiography of Philosophy. In T. Sorell, & G. A. J. Rogers (Eds.), & E. Hughes (Trans.), Analytic philosophy and history of philosophy (pp. 147-159). Oxford, & New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.en
dc.relation.referencesZimmermann, A. (1991). Die gegenwärtige Diskussion von Lehren des Thomas von Aquin in Deutschland. In R. Imbach, & A. Maierù (Eds.), Gli studi di filosofia medievale fra Otto e Novecento: Contributo a un bilancio storiografico. Atti del convegno internazionale, Roma, 21-23 settembre 1989 (pp. 155-166). Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.008


Файли в цьому документі

Thumbnail

Даний документ включений в наступну(і) колекцію(ї)

Показати скорочену інформацію