dc.contributor.author | Tkachenko, R. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Ткаченко, Р. | uk |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-24T07:08:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-24T07:08:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Tkachenko R. A system of methodological coordinates for a historiographer of medieval philosophy: a proposal of an explanatory tool [Текст] / R. Tkachenko // Sententiae. – 2020. – № 2. – С. 8-28. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 2075-6461 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2308-8915 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua//handle/123456789/31650 | |
dc.description.abstract | The last thirty years of scholarship in western medieval philosophical historiography have seen a
number of reflections on the methodological paradigms, schools, trends, and dominant approaches in
the field. As a contribution to this ongoing assessment of the existing methods of studies in medieval
philosophy and theology and a supplement to classifications offered by M. Colish, J. Inglis, C. König-
Pralong, J. Marenbon, A. de Libera, and others, the article offers another explanatory tool.
Here is a description of an imaginary system of methodological coordinates that systematizes the
current tendencies by placing them in a three-dimensional system of axes. Every axis corresponds to a certain aspect of the historical and systematic research in medieval thought and symbolizes a possible movement between two extremes representing opposite methodological values and directions. The methods and approaches practiced in recent studies in medieval philosophy and theology might be sche-matically located inside this general system of argumentational, focal (or objectival), and (con)textual axes with their intersection identified with what some scholars call the “integral” model of study.
This explanatory tool allows one to see how current approaches and methods form a panoply of axes that belong together in one complex grid and helps to visualize the tapestry of existing approaches in medieval philosophical historiography. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Останні тридцять років досліджень у філософській історіографії західноєвропейських Се-редніх віків ознаменувалися появою низки роздумів про методологічні парадигми, школи, те-нденції й панівні підходи в цій галузі. Стаття описує новий пояснювальний інструмент, що може виявитися корисним у процесі постійної оцінки наявних методів вивчення середньовіч-ної філософії й теології та доповнити класифікації, запропоновані свого часу М. Коліш, Дж. Інглісом, К. Кьоніґ-Пралонґ, Дж. Маренбоном, А. де Лібера та іншими.
У статті представлено опис уявної системи методологічних координат, яка систематизує поточні тенденції, поміщаючи їх у тривимірну систему осей. Кожна вісь відповідає певному аспектові історичного й систематичного дослідження середньовічної думки та символізує можливий рух між двома крайнощами, що представляють протилежні методологічні цінності й напрямки. Методи й підходи, що практикуються в останніх дослідженнях середньовічної філософії й теології, можуть бути схематично розміщені всередині цієї загальної системи, яка складається з аргументативної, фокусної (або «об’єктної») і (кон)текстуальної осей, перетин яких ототожнюється з тим, що деякі вчені називають «інтегральною» моделлю студій.
Цей пояснювальний інструмент дозволяє побачити, як сучасні підходи й методи утворю-ють кілька осей, що складаються в одну складну сітку, і допомагає наочно відобразити спектр підходів, наявних у філософській історіографії Середніх віків. | uk |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | ВНТУ | uk |
dc.relation.ispartof | Sententiae. № 2 : 8-28. | en |
dc.relation.uri | https://sententiae.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/sententiae/article/view/527 | |
dc.subject | історичне дослідження | uk |
dc.subject | систематичне дослідження | uk |
dc.subject | середньовічна думка | uk |
dc.subject | методологічні цінності | uk |
dc.subject | філософська історіографія | uk |
dc.title | A system of methodological coordinates for a historiographer of medieval philosophy: a proposal of an explanatory tool | en |
dc.title.alternative | Система методологічних координат для історіографа середньовічної фі-лософії: пропозиція щодо тлумачного інструменту | uk |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.relation.references | Adamson, P. (2007). Al-Kindī. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:
oso/9780195181425.001.0001 | en |
dc.relation.references | Adamson, P. (2017). The Arabic Plotinus: A philosophical study of the “Theology of Aristotle.” Piscataway,
NJ: Gorgias Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Aertsen, J. A. (1996). Medieval philosophy and the transcendentals: The case of Thomas Aquinas. Leiden,
etc.: Brill. | en |
dc.relation.references | Aertsen, J. A., Emery, Jr., K., & Speer, A. (Eds.). (2001). Nach der Verurteilung von 1277: Philosophie
und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts: Studien und
Texte / After the Condemnation of 1277. Philosophy and Theology at the University of Paris in the
Last Quarter of the Thirteenth Century. Studies and Texts. Berlin, & New York: De Gruyter.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820577 | en |
dc.relation.references | Aertsen, J. A., & Speer, A. (Eds.). (1998). Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Qu’est-ce que la
philosophie au Moyen Âge? What is Philosophy in the Middle Ages? Akten des X. Internationalen
Kongresses für Mittelalterliche Philosophie der Société Internationale pour l’Etude de la
Philosophie Médiévale, 25. bis 30. August 1997 in Erfurt. Berlin, & New York: De Gruyter.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110801453 | en |
dc.relation.references | Alexander, J. (2016). The Cambridge School, c. 1875 to 1975. History of Political Thought, 37(2), 360-386. | en |
dc.relation.references | Allison, G. R. (2011). Historical theology: An introduction to Christian doctrine; a companion to Wayne
Grudem’s Systematic theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. | en |
dc.relation.references | Archambault, J. (2014). Aquinas, the a priori/a posteriori distinction, and the Kantian dependency thesis.
Religious Studies, 50(2), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412513000292 | en |
dc.relation.references | Aurell, J. (2005). Introduction: Medievalism and Medievalists in the 20th century. In J. Aurell & F. Crosas
(Eds.), Rewriting the Middle Ages in the twentieth century (pp. 9-23). Turnhout: Brepols.
https://doi.org/10.1484/M.STMH-EB.3.4460 | en |
dc.relation.references | Aurell, J. (2009). Introduction: Modern Medievalism and National Traditions. In J. Aurell, & J. Pavón
Benito (Eds.), Rewriting the Middle Ages in the twentieth century II: National traditions (pp. 9-13).
Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.STMH-EB.3.2396 | en |
dc.relation.references | Aurell, J., & Crosas, F. (Eds.). (2005). Rewriting the Middle Ages in the twentieth century. Turnhout:
Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.BOOKS.6.09070802050003050107010903 | en |
dc.relation.references | Aurell, J., & Pavón Benito, J. (Eds.). (2009). Rewriting the Middle Ages in the twentieth century II: National
traditions. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.BOOKS.6.09070802050003050301040401 | en |
dc.relation.references | Backus, I. (Ed.). (1997). The reception of the church fathers in the West: From the Carolingians to the
Maurists (Vol. 1-2). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391673 | en |
dc.relation.references | Bavaj, R. (2010, September 13). Intellectual History. Docupedia-Zeitgeschichte. Retrieved from
http://docupedia.de/zg/bavaj_intellectual_history_v1_en_2010 | en |
dc.relation.references | Beiser, F. (2007). Historicism. In M. Rosen, & B. Leiter (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Continental
Philosophy (pp. 155-179). New York: Oxford University Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Benevich, F. (2018). Essentialität und Notwendigkeit: Avicenna und die Aristotelische Tradition. Leiden,
& Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004380028 | en |
dc.relation.references | Bevir, M. (1992). The Errors of Linguistic Contextualism. History and Theory, 31(3), 276-298.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2505371 | en |
dc.relation.references | Bianchi, L. (1999). Censure et liberté intellectuelle à l’Université de Paris (XIIIe-XIVe siècles). Paris: Les
Belles Lettres. | en |
dc.relation.references | Bianchi, L. (2000). Testi e contesti nel “nuovo medievismo” italiano. In E. Donaggio & E. Pasini (Eds.),
Cinquant’anni di storiografia filosofica in Italia: Ommaggio a Carlo Viano [congresso torinese
dal 19 al 22 ottobre 1999] (pp. 109-122). Bologna: Il Mulino. | en |
dc.relation.references | Bloch, R. H., Calhoun, A., Cerquiglini-Toulet, J., Küpper, J., & Patterson, J. (Eds.). (2014). Rethinking
the New Medievalism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Boiadzhiev, T., Kapriev, G., & Speer, A. (Eds.). (2000). Die Dionysius-Rezeption im Mittelalter: Internationales
Kolloquium in Sofia vom 8. Bis 11. April 1999 unter der Schirmherrschaft der Société
internationale pour l’étude de la philosophie médiévale. Turnhout: Brepols.
https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.6.09070802050003050101010804 | en |
dc.relation.references | Bose, M. (2006). The intellectual history of the middle ages. In R. Whatmore, & B. Young (Eds.), Palgrave
Advances in Intellectual History (pp. 92-108). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230204300_6 | en |
dc.relation.references | Boulnois, O. (1999). Être et représentation: Une généalogie de la métaphysique moderne à l’époque de
Duns Scot (XIIIe-XIVe siècle). Paris: PUF. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.bouln.1999.01 | en |
dc.relation.references | Boulnois, O. (2007). Généalogies du sujet: De Saint Anselme à Malebranche. Paris: Vrin. | en |
dc.relation.references | Boulnois, O. (2014). Lire le Principe d’individuation de Duns Scot. Paris: Vrin. | en |
dc.relation.references | Bradley, J. E., & Muller, R. A. (2016). Church History: An Introduction to Research Methods and Resources
(Second edition). Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge: Eerdmans. | en |
dc.relation.references | Bradshaw, D. (2006). Aristotle East and West: Metaphysics and the Division of Christendom. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Brock, S. L. (2015). The Philosophy of Saint Thomas Aquinas: A Sketch. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock
Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1p5f24s | en |
dc.relation.references | Brownlee, M. S., Brownlee, K., & Nichols, S. G. (Eds.). (1991). The new medievalism. Baltimore; London:
Johns Hopkins University Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Brun, M. (2005). Die Trinitarische Theologie bei Bonaventura: Ihr Ursprung bei Dionysius Pseudo-Areopagita
und Richard von St.-Victor. Norderstedt: GRIN Verlag. | en |
dc.relation.references | Bubert, M. (2019). Kreative Gegensätze: Der Streit um den Nutzen der Philosophie an der mittelalterlichen
Pariser Universität. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004399518 | en |
dc.relation.references | Butterworth, C. E., & Kessel, B. A. (Eds.). (1994). The Introduction of Arabic Philosophy into Europe.
Leiden, etc.: Brill. https://brill.com/view/title/2296 | en |
dc.relation.references | Campbell, R. (2018). Rethinking Anselm’s Arguments. Leiden: Brill.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004363663 | en |
dc.relation.references | Cantor, N. F. (1991). Inventing the Middle Ages: The Lives, Works, And Ideas Of The Great Medievalists
of the Twentieth Century. New York, NY: William Morrow and Company. | en |
dc.relation.references | Catalani, L., & De Filippis, R. (Eds.). (2018). Anselmo d’Aosta e il pensiero monastico medievale: Atti
del XVIII Convengo Internazionale di studi della Societa Italiana per lo Studio de Pensiero
Medievale (SISPM) (Cava de’ Tirreni – Fisciano, 5-8 dicembre 2009). Turnhout: Brepols.
https://doi.org/10.1484/M.NUTRIX-EB.5.106137 | en |
dc.relation.references | Chapman, A., Coffey, J., & Gregory, B. S. (Eds.). (2009). Seeing things their way: Intellectual history
and the return of religion. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Colish, M. L. (1994). Peter Lombard (Vol. 1-2). Leiden, etc.: Brill.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004246904 | en |
dc.relation.references | Colish, M. L. (2000). Remapping Scholasticism. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
http://www.pims.ca/pdf/colish2000.pdf | en |
dc.relation.references | Collini, S. (2016). The Identity of Intellectual History. In R. Whatmore, & B. Young (Eds.), A companion
to intellectual history (pp. 7-18). Malden, MA, & Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118508091.ch1 | en |
dc.relation.references | Coolman, B. T. (2010). The theology of Hugh of St. Victor: An interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Coolman, B. T. (2017). Knowledge, Love, and Ecstasy in the Theology of Thomas Gallus. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601769.001.0001 | en |
dc.relation.references | Courtenay, W. J. (2008). Ockham and Ockhamism: Studies in the dissemination and impact of his thought.
Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004168305.i-420 | en |
dc.relation.references | Courtenay, W. J., Miethke, J., & Priest, D. B. (Eds.). (2000). University and schooling in medieval society.
Leiden, etc.: Brill. | en |
dc.relation.references | Craig, W. L. (1988). The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents from Aristotle to
Suarez. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004246560 | en |
dc.relation.references | Craig, W. L. (1991). Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom: The Coherence of Theism: Omniscience.
Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004246683 | en |
dc.relation.references | Damico, H. (Ed.). (2000). Philosophy and the Arts (Vol. 3). New York, NY: Garland Publishing. | en |
dc.relation.references | D’Amico, R. (2008). Historicism. In A. Tucker (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of history and historiography
(pp. 243-252). Malden, MA, & Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304916.ch21 | en |
dc.relation.references | Ridder-Symoens, H. de.(Ed.). (1992). Universities in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | DeHart, P. J. (2012). Aquinas and radical orthodoxy: A critical inquiry. New York, & London: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203153055 | en |
dc.relation.references | del Punta, F. (1998). The Genre of Commentaries in Middle Ages and its Relation to the Nature and Originality
of Medieval Thought. In J. A. Aertsen, & A. Speer (Eds.), Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Qu’est-ce
que la philosophie au Moyen Âge? What is Philosophy in the Middle Ages? Akten des X. Internationalen
Kongresses für Mittelalterliche Philosophie der Société Internationale pour l’Etude de la Philosophie
Médiévale, 25. Bis 30. August 1997 in Erfurt (pp. 138-151). Berlin, & New York: De Gruyter. | en |
dc.relation.references | Bok, N. W. den. (1996). Communicating the Most High: A Systematic Study of Person and Trinity in the
Theology of Richard of St. Victor (†1173). [Turnhout, & Paris]: Brepols. | en |
dc.relation.references | Dewan, L. (2006). Form and being: Studies in Thomistic metaphysics. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University
of America Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Duba, W. O. (2017). The forge of doctrine: The academic year 1330-31 and the rise of scotism at the
University of Paris. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SSENT-EB.5.112386 | en |
dc.relation.references | Eder, G., & Ramharter, E. (2015). Formal reconstructions of St. Anselm’s ontological argument. Synthese,
192(9), 2795-2825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0682-8 | en |
dc.relation.references | Elders, L. J. (2018). Thomas Aquinas and his predecessors: The philosophers and the church fathers in his
work. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv8j74r | en |
dc.relation.references | Emery, G., & Levering, M. (Eds.). (2015). Aristotle in Aquinas’s theology. New York, NY, & Oxford:
Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198749639.001.0001 | en |
dc.relation.references | Emery, K., Courtenay, W. J., & Metzger, S. M. (Eds.). (2012). Philosophy and Theology in the Studia of the
Religious Orders and at Papal and Royal Courts. Acts of the XVth Annual Colloquium of the Société
Internationale pour l’Étude de la Philosophie Médiévale, University of Notre Dame, 8-10 October
2008. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.6.09070802050003050403020600 | en |
dc.relation.references | Evans, G. R., & Rosemann, P. W. (Eds.). (2002-2015). Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of
Peter Lombard (Vol. 1-3). Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004283046 | en |
dc.relation.references | Feiss, H., & Mousseau, J. (Eds.). (2017). A companion to the Abbey of Saint Victor in Paris. Leiden, &
Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004351691 | en |
dc.relation.references | Flasch, K. (1987). Einführung in die Philosophie des Mittelalters. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche
Buchgesellschaft. | en |
dc.relation.references | Flasch, K. (2008). Prendre congé de Dilthey; Que serait un néohistorisme en histoire de la philosophie?;
suivi de: Congé à Dilthey (F. Gregorio, & C. König-Pralong, Trans.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres. | en |
dc.relation.references | Flasch, K. (2013). Das philosophische Denken im Mittelalter: Von Augustin zu Machiavelli (Dritte, vollständig
durchgesehene und erweiterte Auflage). Stuttgart: Reclam. | en |
dc.relation.references | Frame, J. M. (2015). A history of Western philosophy and theology. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing. | en |
dc.relation.references | Friedman, R. L. (2002). The Sentences Commentary, 1250-1320: General Trends, the Impact of the Religious
Orders, and the Test Case of Predestination. In G. R. Evans (Ed.), Mediaeval Commentaries
on the Sentences of Peter Lombard (Vol. 1, pp. 41-128). Leiden, etc.: Brill. | en |
dc.relation.references | Friedman, R. L. (2013). Intellectual traditions at the medieval university: The use of philosophical psychology
in Trinitarian theology among the Franciscans and Dominicans, 1250-1350 (Vol. 1-2).
Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004231986 | en |
dc.relation.references | Friedman, R. L., & Nielsen, L. O. (Eds.). (2010). The Medieval Heritage in Early Modern Metaphysics
and Modal Theory, 1400-1700. Dordrecht, & Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. | en |
dc.relation.references | Galluzzo, G. (2013). The Medieval Reception of Book Zeta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Leiden, & Boston:
Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004235021 | en |
dc.relation.references | Galluzzo, G., & Amerini, F. (Eds.). (2014). A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s
Metaphysics. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004261297 | en |
dc.relation.references | Gasper, G. E. M. (2004). Anselm of Canterbury and his Theological Inheritance. Aldershot: Ashgate. | en |
dc.relation.references | Gelber, H. G. (2004). It Could Have Been Otherwise: Contingency and Necessity in Dominican Theology
at Oxford, 1300-1350. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. | en |
dc.relation.references | Gilli, P., Verger, J., & Le Blévec, D. (Eds.). (2007). Les universités et la ville au moyen age: Cohabitation
et tension. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004158764.i-373 | en |
dc.relation.references | Gilson, É. (1955). History of Christian philosophy in the Middle Ages (7th printing). New York, NY:
Random House. | en |
dc.relation.references | Gilson, É. (1969). L’esprit de la philosophie médiévale: Gifford Lectures (Université d’Aberdeen) [1931]
(2. éd. rev.). Paris: Vrin. | en |
dc.relation.references | Gorochov, N. (2012). Naissance de l’université: Les écoles de Paris d’Innocent III à Thomas d’Aquin (v.
1200 - v. 1245). Paris: Champion. | en |
dc.relation.references | Hammond, J. M., Hellmann, J. A. W., & Goff, J. (Eds.). (2014). A Companion to Bonaventure. Leiden,
& Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004260733 | en |
dc.relation.references | Hemming, L. P. (2002). Heidegger’s Atheism: The Refusal of a Theological Voice. Notre Dame, IN: University
of Notre Dame Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Hoenen, M. J. F. M. (1993). Marsilius of Inghen: Divine Knowledge in Late Medieval Thought. Leiden,
etc.: Brill. | en |
dc.relation.references | Hoenen, M. J. F. M., & Nauta, L. (Eds.). (1997). Boethius in the Middle Ages: Latin and Vernacular
Traditions of the Consolatio Philosophiae. Leiden, etc.: Brill. | en |
dc.relation.references | Hoenen, M. J. F. M., Schneider, J. J. H., & Wieland, G. (Eds.). (1995). Philosophy and learning: Universities
in the Middle Ages. Leiden, etc.: Brill. | en |
dc.relation.references | Honnefelder, L. (1990). Scientia transcendens: Die formale Bestimmung der Seiendheit und Realität in
der Metaphysik des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit (Duns Scotus-Suárez-Wolff-Kant-Peirce). Hamburg:
Felix Meiner. https://doi.org/10.28937/978-3-7873-2560-3 | en |
dc.relation.references | Honnefelder, L. (1998). Metaphysik zwischen Onto-Theologik, Transzendentalwissenschaft und universaler
formaler Semantik. Zur philosophischen Aktualität der mittelalterlichen Ansätze von Metaphysik. In
J. A. Aertsen, & A. Speer (Eds.), Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Qu’est-ce que la philosophie au
Moyen Âge? What is Philosophy in the Middle Ages? (pp. 48-59). Berlin, & New York: De Gruyter. | en |
dc.relation.references | Honnefelder, L. (2008). Woher kommen wir? Ursprünge der Moderne im Denken des Mittelalters. Berlin:
Berlin University Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Honnefelder, L., Wood, R., Dreyer, M., & Aris, M.-A. (Eds.). (2005). Albertus Magnus und die Anfänge
der Aristoteles-Rezeption im lateinischen Mittelalter: Von Richardus Rufus bis zu Franciscus de
Mayronis / Albertus Magnus and the beginnings of the medieval reception of Aristotle in the Latin
West: From Richardus Rufus to Franciscus de Mayronis. Münster: Aschendorff. | en |
dc.relation.references | Hovorun, C. (2015). Meta-Ecclesiology: Chronicles on Church Awareness. New York, NY: Palgrave
Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137543936 | en |
dc.relation.references | Imbach, R. (1996). Dante, la philosophie et les laïcs. Ed. universitaires; Paris: Ed. du Cerf. | en |
dc.relation.references | Imbach, R., & König-Pralong, C. (2013). Le défi laïque: Existe-t-il une philosophie de laïcs au Moyen
Âge? Paris: Vrin. | en |
dc.relation.references | Inglis, J. (1998). Spheres of philosophical inquiry and the historiography of medieval philosophy. Leiden,
& Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004247352 | en |
dc.relation.references | James, S. (2018). J.G.A. Pocock and the idea of the ‘Cambridge School’ in the history of political thought.
History of European Ideas, 45, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2018.1498011 | en |
dc.relation.references | Jolivet, J. (1991). Les études de philosophie médiévale en France de Victor Cousin à Étienne Gilson. In
R. Imbach, & A. Maierù (Eds.), Gli studi di filosofia medievale fra Otto e Novecento: Contributo
a un bilancio storiografico. Atti del convegno internazionale, Roma, 21-23 settembre 1989 (pp. 1-
20). Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura. | en |
dc.relation.references | Kapriev, G. (1998). Ipsa Vita et Veritas: Der “ontologische Gottesbeweis” und die Ideenwelt Anselms
von Canterbury. Leiden, & Boston: Brill. | en |
dc.relation.references | Kaylor, N. H., & Phillips, P. E. (Eds.). (2012). A Companion to Boethius in the Middle Ages. Leiden: Brill.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004225381 | en |
dc.relation.references | Kenny, A. (1993). Aquinas on mind. New York, NY; London: Routledge. | en |
dc.relation.references | Kenny, A. (2005). Medieval Philosophy (Vol. 2). Oxford: Clarendon Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Kitanov, S. (2014). Beatific Enjoyment in Medieval Scholastic Debates: The Complex Legacy of Saint
Augustine and Peter Lombard. New York, NY: Lexington Books. | en |
dc.relation.references | Knuuttila, S. (1993). Modalities in Medieval Philosophy. London, & New York: Routledge. | en |
dc.relation.references | Knuuttila, S. (2017). Medieval Theories of Modality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (June 30, 1999; substantive revision Apr 19, 2017). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/
modality-medieval/ | en |
dc.relation.references | Koikkalainen, P. (2011). Contextualist dilemmas: Methodology of the history of political theory in two
stages. History of European Ideas, 37, 315-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2010.10.010 | en |
dc.relation.references | König-Pralong, C. (2009). L’histoire de la philosophie médiévale depuis 1950: Méthodes, textes, débats.
Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 64(1), 143-169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0395264900028602 | en |
dc.relation.references | Kretzmann, N. (1997). The metaphysics of theism: Aquinas’s natural theology in Summa contra gentiles
I. Oxford: Clarendon Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Kretzmann, N. (1998). The metaphysics of creation: Aquinas’s natural theology in Summa contra gentiles
II. Oxford, & New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Küng, H. (1994). Große christliche Denker. München: Piper. | en |
dc.relation.references | Lafleur, C., & Carrier, J. (Eds.). (1997). L’enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle: Autour du
“Guide de l’etudiant” du ms. Ripoll 109: Actes du colloque international. Turnhout: Brepols.
https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SA-EB.5.106202 | en |
dc.relation.references | Lagerlund, H. (2008). The Assimilation of Aristotelian and Arabic Logic up to the Later Thirteenth Century.
In D. M. Gabbay, & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Vol. 2, Mediaeval
and Renaissance Logic (pp. 281-346). Amsterdam, & London: Elsevier North Holland.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-5857(08)80026-X | en |
dc.relation.references | Lamb, R. (2009). Quentin Skinner’s revised historical contextualism: A critique. History of the Human
Sciences, 22(3), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695109104423 | en |
dc.relation.references | Le Goff, J. (1985). Les intellectuels au Moyen Âge. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. | en |
dc.relation.references | Léchot, P.-O. (Ed.). (2018). Introduction à l’histoire de la théologie. Genève: Labor et Fides. | en |
dc.relation.references | Leinsle, U. G. (1995). Einführung in die scholastische Theologie. Paderborn: Schöningh. | en |
dc.relation.references | Leinsle, U. G. (2010). Introduction to Scholastic Theology (M. J. Miller, Trans.). Washington, D.C.: Catholic
University of America Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Levering, M., & Plested, M. (Eds.). (2021). The Oxford Handbook of the Reception of Aquinas. Oxford:
Oxford University Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Libera, A. de. (1991a). Les études de philosophie médiévale en France d’Étienne Gilson à nos jours. In
R. Imbach, & A. Maierù (Eds.), Gli studi di filosofia medievale fra Otto e Novecento: Contributo
a un bilancio storiografico. Atti del convegno internazionale, Roma, 21-23 settembre 1989 (pp. 21-
50). Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura. | en |
dc.relation.references | Libera, A. de. (1991b). Penser au Moyen Âge. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. | en |
dc.relation.references | Libera, A. de. (1999). Le relativisme historique: Théorie des “des complexes questions-réponses” et
“traçabilite.” Études philosophiques, 4, 479-494. | en |
dc.relation.references | Libera, A. de. (2014). Où va la philosophie médiévale? Paris: Fayard; Collège de France.
https://doi.org/10.4000/books.cdf.3634 | en |
dc.relation.references | Libera, A. de. (2016). L’Archéologie philosophique: Séminaire du Collège de France, 2013-2014. Paris: Vrin. | en |
dc.relation.references | Libera, A. de. (2019). Philosophie médiévale. Paris: PUF. | en |
dc.relation.references | Luscombe, D. E. (1991). The study of medieval philosophy in England in the nineteenth and twentieth
centuries: An initial appraisal. In R. Imbach, & A. Maierù (Eds.), Gli studi di filosofia medievale
fra Otto e Novecento: Contributo a un bilancio storiografico. Atti del convegno internazionale,
Roma, 21-23 settembre 1989 (pp. 131-140). Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura. | en |
dc.relation.references | MacDonald, S. (1993). Theory of Knowledge. In N. Kretzmann, & E. Stump (Eds.), The Cambridge
Companion to Aquinas (pp. 160-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521431956.007 | en |
dc.relation.references | Maierù, A. (1994). University training in medieval Europe (D. N. Pryds, Ed. & Trans.). Leiden, etc.: Brill. | en |
dc.relation.references | Maierù, A., & Valente, L. (Eds.). (2004). Medieval theories on assertive and non-assertive language. Acts
of the 14th European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics. Florence: Olschki. | en |
dc.relation.references | Marenbon, J. (1997). The Philosophy of Peter Abelard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511582714 | en |
dc.relation.references | Marenbon, J. (1998). Introduction. In J. Marenbon (Ed.), Medieval Philosophy (pp. 1-10). London:
Routledge. | en |
dc.relation.references | Marenbon, J. (2003). Boethius. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195134079.001.0001 | en |
dc.relation.references | Marenbon, J. (2007). Medieval Philosophy: An Historical and Philosophical Introduction. London:
Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203968765 | en |
dc.relation.references | Marenbon, J. (2011). Why study medieval philosophy? In M. van Ackeren, T. Kobusch, & J. Müller
(Eds.), Warum noch Philosophie?: Historische, systematische und gesellschaftliche Positionen (pp.
60-73). Berlin, & Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223767.65 | en |
dc.relation.references | Marenbon, J. (2013). Abelard in Four Dimensions: A Twelfth-Century Philosopher in His Context and
Ours. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame. | en |
dc.relation.references | Marenbon, J. (2018). Why We Need a Real History of Philosophy. In M. van Ackeren, & L. Klein (Eds.),
Philosophy and the historical perspective (pp. 36-50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266298.003.0003 | en |
dc.relation.references | Marenbon, J. (Ed.). (2020). King’s Hall, Cambridge and the Fourteenth-Century Universities: New Perspectives.
Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004435056 | en |
dc.relation.references | Marion, J.-L. (1982). Dieu sans l’étre: Hors-texte. Paris: Fayard. | en |
dc.relation.references | Marion, J.-L. (2002). Dieu sans l’étre: Hors-texte (2éme édition). Paris: Quadrige; PUF. | en |
dc.relation.references | Marmursztejn, E. (2007). L’autorité des maîtres: Scolastique, normes et société au XIIIe siècle. Paris: Les
Belles Lettres. | en |
dc.relation.references | McCord Adams, M. (2010). Some Later Medieval Theories of the Eucharist: Thomas Aquinas, Giles of
Rome, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591053.001.0001 | en |
dc.relation.references | McCosker, P., & Turner, D. (Eds.). (2016). The Cambridge Companion to the Summa Theologiae. New
York, & Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139034159 | en |
dc.relation.references | McGrade, A. S. (Ed.). (2003). The Cambridge companion to medieval philosophy. New York, NY: Cambridge
University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521806038 | en |
dc.relation.references | McIntyre, A. (1990). Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopaedia, Genealogy, and Tradition:
Gifford lectures delivered in the University of Edinburgh in 1988. Notre Dame, IN: University of
Notre Dame Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | McIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (3rd edition). Notre Dame, IN: University of
Notre Dame Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Milbank, J. (2006). Theology and social theory: Beyond secular reason (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694121 | en |
dc.relation.references | Milbank, J. (2019). Afterword: The Dissolution of Divine Government: Gilson and the “Scotus Story.” In
J. G. Colbert (Trans.), John Duns Scotus: Introduction to his fundamental positions (pp. 538-576).
London, etc.: T & T Clark. | en |
dc.relation.references | Milbank, J., & Pickstock, C. (2001). Truth in Aquinas. London, & New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203467923 | en |
dc.relation.references | Mulchahey, M. M. (1998). “First the Bow is Bent in Study...”: Dominican Education before 1350. Toronto:
Pontifical Institute for Medieval Studies. | en |
dc.relation.references | Newton, L. (Ed.). (2008). Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories. Leiden: Brill.
https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004167520.I-441 | en |
dc.relation.references | Noone, T. B. (2001). Medieval Scholarship and Philosophy in the Last One Hundred Years. In B. J. Shanley
(Ed.), One Hundred Years of Philosophy (pp. 111-132). Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University
of America Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcj2n9s.9 | en |
dc.relation.references | Normore, C. G. (1990). Doxology and the History of Philosophy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 16,
203-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1990.10717226 | en |
dc.relation.references | Novikoff, A. J. (2013). The medieval culture of disputation: Pedagogy, practice, and performance. Philadelphia,
PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812208634 | en |
dc.relation.references | Oexle, O. G. (2001). L’historisme en débat: De Nietzsche à Kantorowicz. Paris: Aubier. | en |
dc.relation.references | Oliva, A. (2006). Les débuts de l’enseignement de Thomas d’Aquin et sa conception de la Sacra Doctrina,
avec l’édition du prologue de son Commentaire des Sentences. Paris: Vrin. | en |
dc.relation.references | Oppy, G. (1995). Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663840 | en |
dc.relation.references | Osborne, K. B. (Ed.). (2007). The history of Franciscan theology. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan
Institute; St. Bonaventure University. | en |
dc.relation.references | Otten, W., & Pollmann, K. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford guide to the historical reception of Augustine (Vol.
1-3). Oxford, & New York: Oxford University Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Pacheco, M. C. (Ed.). (1999). Le vocabulaire des écoles des Mendiants au moyen âge: Actes du colloque
de Porto (Portugal), 11-12 octobre 1996. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CIVIEB.
6.09070802050003050008000203 | en |
dc.relation.references | Panaccio, C. (1998). La référence transtemporelle et l’étude de la philosophie médiévale. In J. A. Aertsen,
& A. Speer (Eds.), Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Qu’est-ce que la philosophie au Moyen
Âge? What is Philosophy in the Middle Ages? (pp. 360-367). Berlin, & New York: De Gruyter. | en |
dc.relation.references | Panaccio, C. (2000). Philosophie analytique et histoire de la philosophie. In P. Engel (Ed.), Précis de
philosophie analytique (pp. 325-344). Paris: PUF. | en |
dc.relation.references | Panaccio, C. (2019). Récit et reconstruction: Les fondements de la méthode en histoire de la philosophie.
Paris: Vrin. | en |
dc.relation.references | Perler, D. (2004). Theorien der intentionalität im Mittelalter (2. durchgesehene Auflage). Frankfurt am
Main: Klostermann. https://doi.org/10.3196/9783465032892 | en |
dc.relation.references | Perler, D. (2012). Zweifel und Gewissheit: Skeptische Debatten im Mittelalter (2. durchgesehene Auflage).
Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. | en |
dc.relation.references | Plourde, J. (2019). Histoire de la philosophie, historiographie et philosophie: Réflexions critiques au sujet
de la portée de la thèse de la pertinence philosophique de l’histoire de la philosophie.
Philosophiques, 46(2), 381-393. https://doi.org/10.7202/1066777ar | en |
dc.relation.references | Pohl, B., & Gathagan, L. L. (Eds.). (2017). A companion to the Abbey of Le Bec in the Central Middle
Ages (11th-13th centuries). Leiden, & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004351905 | en |
dc.relation.references | Pomplun, R. T. (2016). John Duns Scotus in the History of Medieval Philosophy from the Sixteenth Century
to Étienne Gilson (†1978). Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 58, 355-445.
https://doi.org/10.1484/J.BPM.5.113344 | en |
dc.relation.references | Porro, P. (2012). Tommaso d’Aquino: Un profilo storico-filosofico. Roma: Carocci. | en |
dc.relation.references | Porro, P. (2015). Thomas Aquinas: A historical and philosophical profile (R. W. Nutt, & J. G. Trabbic,
Trans.). Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Posti, M. (2020). Medieval Theories of Divine Providence 1250-1350. Leiden, & Boston: Brill.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004429727 | en |
dc.relation.references | Putallaz, F.-X. (1997). Figures franciscaines. Paris: Éditions du Cerf. | en |
dc.relation.references | Rée, J. (1978). Philosophy and the History of Philosophy. In J. Rée, M. Ayers, & A. Westoby, Philosophy
and Its Past (pp. 1-39). Hassocks, Sussex: The Harvester Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Reisman, D. C. (2002). The Making of the Avicennan Tradition: The Transmission, Contents, and Structure
of Ibn Sīnā’s al-Mubāḥaṭāt (The Discussions). Leiden, etc.: Brill. | en |
dc.relation.references | Richter, M. (2003). Towards a Lexicon of European Political and Legal Concepts: A Comparison of Begriffsgeschichte
and the “Cambridge School.” Critical Review of International Political and Social
Philosophy, 6(2), 91-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230510001702773 | en |
dc.relation.references | Roest, B. (2000). A history of Franciscan education (c. 1210-1517). Leiden, etc.: Brill. | en |
dc.relation.references | Roest, B. (2015). Franciscan Learning, Preaching and Mission c. 1220-1650: Cum scientia sit donum
Dei, armatura ad defendendam sanctam fidem catholicam... Leiden, & Boston: Brill.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004280731 | en |
dc.relation.references | Rogers, K. A. (2007). The Necessity of the Present and Anselm’s Eternalist Response to the Problem of
Theological Fatalism. Religious Studies, 43(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412506008742 | en |
dc.relation.references | Rogers, K. A. (2008). Anselm on freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:
oso/9780199231676.001.0001 | en |
dc.relation.references | Rogers, K. A. (2015). Freedom and self-creation: Anselmian libertarianism. Oxford: Oxford University
Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198743972.001.0001 | en |
dc.relation.references | Rorty, R. (1984). The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres. In R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, & Q. Skinner
(Eds.), Philosophy in History: Essays in the Historiography of Philosophy (pp. 49-76). Cambridge,
& New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625534.006 | en |
dc.relation.references | Rosemann, P. W. (1999). Introduction: A Change of Paradigm in the Study of Medieval Thought: From
Rationalism to Postmodernism. In P. W. Rosemann, Understanding Scholastic Thought with Foucault
(pp. 1-17). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Rosemann, P. W. (2004). Peter Lombard. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195155440.001.0001 | en |
dc.relation.references | Rosemann, P. W. (2007). The Story of a Great Medieval Book: Peter Lombard’s Sentences. Peterborough,
Ontario: Broadview Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Schabel, C. (Ed.). (2006). Theological quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The thirteenth century. Leiden, &
Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047404149 | en |
dc.relation.references | Schabel, C. (Ed.). (2007). Theological quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The fourteenth century. Leiden, &
Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004162884.i-793 | en |
dc.relation.references | Schumacher, L. (2019). Early Franciscan theology: Between authority and innovation. New York; Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595087 | en |
dc.relation.references | Schumacher, L. (Ed.). (2020a). The Summa Halensis: Doctrines and Debates. Berlin, & Boston: De Gruyter.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685008 | en |
dc.relation.references | Schumacher, L. (Ed.). (2020b). The Summa Halensis: Sources and Context. Berlin, & Boston: De Gruyter.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022 | en |
dc.relation.references | Schweitzer, D. (2007). Aspects of God’s relationship to the world in the theologies of Jürgen Moltmann,
Bonaventure and Jonathan Edwards. Religious Studies and Theology, 26(1), 5-24.
https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.v26i1.5 | en |
dc.relation.references | Silva, R. (2010). O contextualismo linguístico na história do pensamento político: Quentin Skinner e o
debate metodológico contemporâneo [Linguistic contextualism in the history of politic thought:
Quentin Skinner and the contemporary methodological debate]. Dados, 53(2), 299-335.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582010000200002 | en |
dc.relation.references | Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of Politics. Volume 1: Regarding Method. New York; Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Smith, A. D. (2014). Anselm’s Other Argument. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674726000 | en |
dc.relation.references | Smith, G. R. (2013). The Problem of Divine Attributes from Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus [Ph.D. Dissertation].
Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame (Graduate Program in Medieval Studies). | en |
dc.relation.references | Southern, R. W. (1990). Saint Anselm: A Portrait in a Landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Southern, R. W. (1995). Scholastic Humanism and the Unification of Europe (Vol. 1-2). (L. Smith, & B.
Ward, Eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. | en |
dc.relation.references | Southern, R. W. (2001). The Heroic Age (Vol. 2). (L. Smith, & B. Ward, Eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. | en |
dc.relation.references | Stump, E. (2001). Augustine on free will. In E. Stump, & N. Kretzmann (Eds.), The Cambridge companion
to Augustine (pp. 124-147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521650186.011 | en |
dc.relation.references | Stump, E. (2003). Aquinas. London, & New York: Routledge. | en |
dc.relation.references | Stump, E. (2014). Augustine on free will. In D. V. Meconi, & E. Stump (Eds.), The Cambridge companion
to Augustine (2nd ed., pp. 166-186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139178044.014 | en |
dc.relation.references | Sweeney, E. C. (2012). Anselm of Canterbury and the Desire for the Word. Washington, D.C.: Catholic
University of America Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt2852r7 | en |
dc.relation.references | Velde, R. T. te. (2013). The Doctrine of God in Reformed Orthodoxy, Karl Barth, and the Utrecht School:
A Study in Method and Content. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004252462 | en |
dc.relation.references | Teeuwen, M. (2003). The Vocabulary of Intellectual Life in the Middle Ages. Turnhout: Brepols.
https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CIVI-EB.5.105931 | en |
dc.relation.references | Tribe, K. (2016). Intellectual History as Begriffsgeschichte. In R. Whatmore, & B. Young (Eds.), A companion
to intellectual history (pp. 61-71). Malden, MA; Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118508091.ch5 | en |
dc.relation.references | Turner, D. (2004). Faith, reason, and the existence of God. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617317 | en |
dc.relation.references | Van Steenberghen, F. (1991). La philosophie au XIIIe siècle (2e éd.). Louvain-la-Neuve: Éditions de
l’Institut Superieur de Philosophie. | en |
dc.relation.references | Van Steenberghen, F. (1992). Le thomisme (2e éd.). Pari: PUF. | en |
dc.relation.references | Verger, J. (1995). Les universités françaises au Moyen Age. Leiden: Brill. | en |
dc.relation.references | Verger, J. (1998). Les gens de savoir dans l’Europe de la fin du Moyen Âge. Paris: PUF.
https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.verge.1998.01 | en |
dc.relation.references | Visser, S., & Williams, T. (2009). Anselm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:
oso/9780195309386.001.0001 | en |
dc.relation.references | Vos, A. (2001). Scholasticism and Reformation. In W. J. van Asselt, & E. Dekker (Eds.), Reformation
and Scholasticism. An Ecumenical Enterprise (pp. 99-119). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic. | en |
dc.relation.references | Vos, A. (2006). The Philosophy of John Duns Scotus. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748624621.001.0001 | en |
dc.relation.references | Vos, A. (2010). Scotus’ Significance for Western Philosophy and Theology. In F. Fiorentino (Ed.), Lo
scotismo nel mezzogiorno d’Italia: Atti del Congresso internazionale (Bitonto 25-28 marzo 2008) in
occasione del VII centenario della morte di Giovanni Duns Scoto (pp. 173-209). Porto: Fédération
Internationale des Instituts d’Études Médiévales. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.TEMA-EB.4.00818 | en |
dc.relation.references | Vos, A. (2018). The Theology of John Duns Scotus. Leiden, & Boston: Brill.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004360235 | en |
dc.relation.references | Vos, A., Veldhuis, H., Looman-Graaskamp, A. H., Dekker, E., & den Bok, N. W. (1994). John Duns
Scotus. Contingency and Freedom. Lectura I 39. Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Dordrecht,
etc.: Kluwer Academic Publishers. | en |
dc.relation.references | Wei, I. P. (2012). Intellectual culture in medieval Paris: Theologians and the university, c.1100-1330.
New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511842108 | en |
dc.relation.references | Weijers, O. (2002). La “disputatio” dans les Facultés des arts au Moyen Âge. Turnhout: Brepols.
https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SA-EB.5.106207 | en |
dc.relation.references | Weijers, O. (Ed.). (2009). Queritur utrum: Recherches sur la ‘disputatio’ dans les universités médiévales.
Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SA-EB.5.106217 | en |
dc.relation.references | Weijers, O. (2013). In Search of the Truth: A History of Disputation Techniques from Antiquity to Early
Modern Times. Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SFAHI-EB.5.112315 | en |
dc.relation.references | Weijers, O. (2015). A Scholar’s Paradise: Teaching and Debating in Medieval Paris. Turnhout: Brepols.
https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SFAHI-EB.5.112316 | en |
dc.relation.references | Weijers, O., & Verger, J. (Eds.). (2013). Les débuts de l’enseignement universitaire à Paris (1200-1245
environ). Turnhout: Brepols. | en |
dc.relation.references | Whatmore, R. (2015). Cambridge School of Intellectual History. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia
of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 61-65). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.61171-6 | en |
dc.relation.references | Whatmore, R. (2016). What is intellectual history? Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity. | en |
dc.relation.references | Whatmore, R., & Young, B. (Eds.). (2006). Palgrave Advances in Intellectual History. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230204300 | en |
dc.relation.references | Whatmore, R., & Young, B. (Eds.). (2016). A companion to intellectual history. Malden, MA; Oxford:
Wiley Blackwell. | en |
dc.relation.references | Wickberg, D. (2014). In the environment of ideas: Arthur Lovejoy and the history of ideas as a form of
cultural history. Modern Intellectual History, 11(2), 439-464. Cambridge Core.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244314000080 | en |
dc.relation.references | Wielockx, R. (1991). De Mercier à De Wulf. Débuts de l’«École de Louvain». In R. Imbach, & A. Maierù
(Eds.), Gli studi di filosofia medievale fra Otto e Novecento: Contributo a un bilancio storiografico.
Atti del convegno internazionale, Roma, 21-23 settembre 1989 (pp. 75-96). Roma: Edizioni di
Storia e Letteratura. | en |
dc.relation.references | Wippel, J. F. (2000). The metaphysical thought of Thomas Aquinas: From finite being to uncreated being.
Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Wippel, J. F. (2007). Metaphysical themes in Thomas Aquinas II. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University
of America Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Young, S. E. (2014). Scholarly Community at the Early University of Paris: Theologians, Education and
Society, 1215-1248. New York, NY; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381178 | en |
dc.relation.references | Zarka, Y. C. (2001). Que nous emporte l’histoire de la philosophie? Essai inédit. In Y. C. Zarka (Ed.),
Comment écrire l’histoire de la philosophie? (pp. 19-31). Paris: PUF. | en |
dc.relation.references | Zarka, Y. C. (2005). The Ideology of Context: Uses and Abuses of Context in the Historiography of Philosophy.
In T. Sorell, & G. A. J. Rogers (Eds.), & E. Hughes (Trans.), Analytic philosophy and history of
philosophy (pp. 147-159). Oxford, & New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press. | en |
dc.relation.references | Zimmermann, A. (1991). Die gegenwärtige Diskussion von Lehren des Thomas von Aquin in Deutschland.
In R. Imbach, & A. Maierù (Eds.), Gli studi di filosofia medievale fra Otto e Novecento:
Contributo a un bilancio storiografico. Atti del convegno internazionale, Roma, 21-23 settembre
1989 (pp. 155-166). Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura. | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.008 | |