| dc.contributor.author | Луковина, О. | uk |
| dc.contributor.author | Lukovyna, O. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-31T09:30:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-05-31T09:30:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Луковина О. Захист автентичного неопірронізму. Smith, P. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Cham: Springer. [Текст] / О. Луковина // Sententiae. – 2022. – № 2. – С. 124-143. | uk |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2075-6461 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2308-8915 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua//handle/123456789/42553 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Огляд книги Smith, P. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Cham: Springer. | uk |
| dc.description.abstract | Review of Smith, P. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Cham: Springer. | en |
| dc.language.iso | uk_UA | uk_UA |
| dc.publisher | ВНТУ | uk |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Sententiae. № 2 : 124-143. | en |
| dc.relation.uri | https://sententiae.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/sententiae/article/view/631 | |
| dc.subject | скептичне міркування | uk |
| dc.subject | краще життя | uk |
| dc.subject | метод | uk |
| dc.subject | sceptical reasoning | en |
| dc.subject | best life | en |
| dc.subject | method | en |
| dc.title | Захист автентичного неопірронізму. Smith, P. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Cham: Springer. | uk |
| dc.title.alternative | Defense of Authentic Neo-Pyrrhonism. Smith, P. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Cham: Springer. | en |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.relation.references | Панич, О. (2007). Розвідки з історії скептицизму в британо-американській епістемології. Частина перша. Британська модерна філософія (Гоббс, Локк, Барклі, Х’юм, Рід). Донецьк: ДонНУ. | uk |
| dc.relation.references | Звонська, Л. (2020). «Нариси пірронізму» Секста Емпірика парадигма термінів і перекладацькі інтенції. Sententiae, 39(2), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.092 | uk |
| dc.relation.references | Секст Емпірик. (2020). Нариси Пірронізму (I, 1-13). Sententiae, 39(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.125 | uk |
| dc.relation.references | Annas, J. (1995). The morality of happiness. New York & Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195096525.001.0001 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Annas, J. (1998). Doing without objective values: Ancient and modern strategies. In S. Everson (Ed.), Ethics. Companions to ancient thought 4 (pp. 193-220). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166348.008 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Annas, J., & Barnes, J. (1985). The modes of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586187 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Austin, J. L. (1964). Sense and sensibilia. London, & New York: Oxford UP. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Bailey, A. (2002). Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonean Scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198238522.001.0001 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Barnes, J. (1982). The beliefs of a Pyrrhonists.Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 28, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500004375 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Bates, D. C. (2022). Book Review: Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience.Medium, https://pyrrhonism.medium.com/book-review-sextus-empiricus-neo-pyrrhonism-skepticism-as-a-rationally-ordered-experience-4c812dbad3d4 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Bett, R. (2019). How to be a Pyrrhonist: The practice and significance of Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108557603 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Bolzani Filho, R. (1990). Ceticismo e empirismo. Discurso, (18), 37-68.https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.1990.37939 | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Burnyeat, M. (1998a). Can the Sceptic live his Scepticism? In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The origina Sceptics: A controversy (pp. 25-57).Indianapolis, & Cambridge:Hackett. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Burnyeat, M. (1998b). The Sceptic in his place and time. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original Sceptics: A controversy (pp. 92-126). Indianapolis, & Cambridge:Hackett. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Claudius Galenus. (1822).Opera Omnia (vol. IV). (C. G. Kühn, Hrsg.). Lipsiae: Сar. Cnoblochii. | la |
| dc.relation.references | Claudius Galenus. (1824). Opera Omnia (v ol. VIII). (C. G. Kühn, Hrsg.). Lipsiae: Сar . Cnoblochii. | la |
| dc.relation.references | Claudius Galenus. (1827). Opera Omnia (v ol. XIV). (C. G. Kühn, Hrsg.). Lipsiae: Сar. Cnoblochii. | la |
| dc.relation.references | Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198237537.001.0001 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Eichorn, R. (2014). How (not) to read Sextus Empiricus. Ancient Philosophy, 34(1), 121-149.https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil20143418 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Eichorn, R. (2020). Sextus Empiricus on Isostheneiaand Epoche: A Developmental Model. Skepsis, 11(21), 188-209. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Frede, M. (1990). An Empiricist view of knowledge: Memorism. In S. Everson (Ed.), Epistemology(pp. 225-250). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Frede, M. (1998a). The Sceptic’s beliefs. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original Sceptics: A controversy (pp. 1-24). Cambridge, In.: Hackett. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Frede, M. (1998b). The Sceptic’s two kinds of assent and the question of the possibility of knowledge. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original Sceptics: A controversy (pp. 127-151). Indianapolis, & Cambridge: Hackett. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Marcondes de Souza Filho, D. (1997). O mundo do homem feliz: considerações sobre ceticismo e valores. O que nos faz pensar, 12, 49-66. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Massie, P. (2013). Philosophy and Ataraxia in Sextus Empiricus. Peitho. Examina Antiqua, 4(1 ), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.14746/pea.2013.1.10 | la |
| dc.relation.references | McDowell, J. (2009). Conceptual capacities in perception. In J. McDowell (Ed.), Having the world in view: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Morison, B. (2011). The logical structure of the sceptic’s opposition. In J. Allen, E. Emilson, & W. Mann (Eds.), Essays in memory of Michael Frede (pp. 265-295). Oxford: Oxford UP. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Perin, C. (2010). The demands of reason: An essay on Pyrrhonian Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford UP.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557905.001.0001 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (2007a). Ceticismo e Argumentação. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao Ceticismo(pp. 147-172). São Paulo: UNESP. https://doi.org/10.7476/9788539304486 | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (2007b). Empirismo e ceticismo. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo(pp. 289-322). São Paulo: UNESP. https://doi.org/10.7476/9788539304486 | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Quine, W. V. (1992). The pursuit of truth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Sextus Empiricus. (1562). Pyrrhoniarum hipotyposeon libri tres. (H. Stephanus, Trans.). Parisiis: M. Iuuenem. | la |
| dc.relation.references | Sextus Empiricus. (1933). Outlines of Pyrrhonism. (R. G. Bury, Ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP. https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.sextus_empiricus-outlines_pyrrhonism.1933 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (1995). O ceticismo de Hume. São Paulo: Loyola. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2013a). Bayle and pyrrhonism: Antinomy, method, and history. In S. Charles & P. J. Smith (Eds.), Scepticism in the eighteenth century: Enlightenment, Lumières, Aufklärung(pp. 19-30). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4810-1_2 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2013b). Kant’s criticism and the legacy of modern Scepticism. In S. Charles & P. J. Smith (Eds.), Scepticism in the eighteenth century: Enlightenment, Lumières, Aufklärung(pp. 247-263). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4810-1_17 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. São Paulo: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94518-3 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Strawson, P. F. (2006). Individuals: An essay in descriptive metaphysics. London: Routledge. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Striker, G. (2004). Historical reflections on classical pyrrhonism and neo-pyrrhonism. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism (pp. 13-24). Oxford: Oxford UP.https://doi.org/10.1093/0195169727.003.0002 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Thorsrud, H. (2009). Ancient Scepticism. Stocksfield: Acumen.https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844654093 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Thorsrud, H. (2019). Sextus Empiricus on the Siren Song of reason and the Skeptical defense of ordinary life. Logos & Episteme, 10(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20191012 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Vogt, K. (2011). The aims of skeptical investigation. In D. Machuca (Ed.), Pyrrhonism in ancient, modern, and contemporary philosophy (pp. 33-50). Dordrecht: Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1991-0_3 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Williams, M. (1988). Scepticism without theory. Review of Metaphysics, 61, 547-588. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Woodruff, P. (2010). The pyrrhonian modes. In R. Bett (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to ancient Scepti-cism (pp. 208-231). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874762.012 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.02.124 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7876-9536 | |
