| dc.contributor.author | Plínio Junqueira Smith | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Lukovyna, O. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Плініо Жункейра Сміт | uk |
| dc.contributor.author | Луковина, О. | uk |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-06T09:02:21Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-06-06T09:02:21Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Plínio Junqueira Smith Research on Scepticism in Brazilian Philosophy [Текст] / Plínio Junqueira Smith, О. Луковина // Sententiae. – 2023. – № 1. – С. 147-170. | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2075-6461 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2308-8915 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua//handle/123456789/42642 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Olexandr Lukovyna’s interview with Professor Plínio Junqueira Smith is devoted to skeptic research in Brazilian philosophy, the beginning of skeptic studies in Brazil, Oswaldo Porchat’s and Ezequiel de Olaso’s roles in establishing the tradition of skeptic studies, contemporary studies in skepticism, and the global state of affairs in skeptic research. | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Інтерв’ю Олександра Луковини з професором Плініо Жункейрою Смітом, присвячене дослідженню скептицизму у бразильській філософії, зокрема початковому етапові цього вивчення, внескам Освальдо Порчата та Єзекіля де Оласо, сучасному бразильському неопірронізмові та ґлобальному дослідницькому контекстові. | uk |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | ВНТУ | uk |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Sententiae. № 1 : 147-170. | en |
| dc.relation.uri | https://sententiae.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/sententiae/article/view/812 | |
| dc.subject | Neo-Pyrrhonism | en |
| dc.subject | Oswaldo Porchat | en |
| dc.subject | Ezequiel de Olaso | es |
| dc.subject | неопірронізм | uk |
| dc.subject | Освальдо Поршат | uk |
| dc.subject | Есек’єль Оласо | uk |
| dc.title | Research on Scepticism in Brazilian Philosophy | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Дослідження скептицизму в бразильській філософії | uk |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.relation.references | Arantes, P. E. (1994). Um departamento francês de ultramar. São Paulo: Paz e Terra. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Barnes, J. (1998). The Beliefs of a Pyrrhonist. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.). The Original Sceptics: A Controversy (pp. 58-91). Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Barrio, E. (2000). La otra cara del escéptico. In L. H. Dutra & P. J. Smith (Eds.), Ceticismo: perspectivas históricas e filosóficas (pp. 63-80). Florianópolis: Editora da UFSC-NEL. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Bolzani Filho, R. (2013). Acadêmicos versus pirrônicos. São Paulo: Alameda Editorial. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Burnyeat, M. (1998). Can the Sceptic Live his Scepticism? In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The Original Sceptics: A Controversy (pp. 25-57). Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Charles, S., & Smith, P. J. (Eds.). (2013). Scepticism in the Eighteenth Century: Enlightenment, Lumières, Aufklärung. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4810-2 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Charles, S., & Smith, P. J. (Eds.). (2017). Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Costa, J. C. (1956). Contribuição à história das ideias no Brasil. São Paulo: Livraria José Olympio Editora. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Dutra, L. H. de A., & Smith, P. J. (Eds.). (2000). Ceticismo: perspectivas históricas e filosóficas. Florianópolis: Editora da UFSC-NEL. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Figueiredo, Nara M. & Smith, P. J. (Eds.). 2022. Epistemologia dos eixos: interpretações e debates sobre as (in)certezas de Wittgenstein. Porto Alegre: Editora Fundação Fênix. https://doi.org/10.36592/9786554600019 | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Fogelin, R. J. (1994). Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195089871.001.0001 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Fogelin, R. J. (2004). The skeptics are coming! The skeptics are coming! In S.-A. Walter (Ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism (pp. 161-173). Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195169727.003.0009 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Frede, M. (1998). The Sceptic’s Belief. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The Original Sceptics: A Controversy (pp. 1-24). Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Kornblith, H. (2010). Belief in the Face of Controversy. In R. Feldman & T. Warfield (Eds.), Disa-greement (pp. 29-52). Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226078.003.0003 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Kornblith, H. (2013). Is Philosophical Knowledge Possible? In D. Machuca (Ed.), Disagreement and Skepticism (pp. 260-273). New York; London: Routledge. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Lukovyna, O. (2022). Defense of Authentic Neo-Pyrrhonism. Smith, P. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Cham: Springer. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 41(2), 124-143. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.02.124 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Nobre, M., & Rego, J. M. (Eds.). (2000). Conversas com filósofos brasileiros. São Paulo: Editora 34. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Pettersen, B. (2012). A narrativa neopirrônica: uma análise das obras de Porchat e Fogelin. Tese de doutorado. Belo Horizonte: UFMG. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Pinto, Á. V. (1960). Consciência e realidade nacional. Rio de Janeiro: ISEB. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1969). O conflito das filosofias. Revista Brasileira de Filosofia, 19(73), 3-15. [Reprinted in Porchat 2007, pp. 13-23.] | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1975). Prefácio a uma filosofia. Discurso, 6, 9-24. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.1975.37789 [Reprinted in Porchat 2007, pp. 25-39.] | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1979). A filosofia e a visão comum do mundo. Manuscrito, 3(1), 143-159. [Reprinted in Porchat 2007, pp. 41-71.] | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1986). Saber comum e ceticismo. Manuscrito, 9(1), 143-159. [Reprinted in Porchat 2007, pp. 73-88.] | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1991). Sobre o que aparece. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia, 17(2), 195-229. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.1992.37951 [Reprinted in Discurso, 19, 83-121; and in Porchat 2007, pp. 117-145.] | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1995). Verdade, realismo, ceticismo. Discurso, 35, 61-108. [Reprinted in Porchat 2007, pp. 173-217.] | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1996). O ceticismo pirrônico e os problemas filosóficos. Cadernos de Hitória e Filosofia da Ciência, 3(6), 97-157. [Reprinted in Porchat 2007, pp. 219-257.] | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (2002). O argumento da loucura. Manuscrito, 26(1), 11-43. [Reprinted in Porchat 2007, pp. 323-343.] | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (2005). Empirismo e ceticismo. Discurso, 35, 61-108. [Reprinted in Porchat 2007, pp. 289-322.] | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (2007). Rumo ao ceticismo. São Paulo: Editora Unesp. https://doi.org/10.7476/9788539304486 | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Prado Jr., B. (1985). O problema da filosofia no Brasil. In Alguns ensaios: filosofia, literatura, psicanálise (pp. 173-194). São Paulo: Max Limonad. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Prado Jr., B. (1989). Presença e campo transcendental: consciência e negatividade na filosofia de Bergson. São Paulo: EDUSP. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Quine, W. v. O. (1996). O sentido da nova lógica. Curitiba: Editora da UFPR. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Raga Rosaleny, V., & Smith, P. J. (Eds.). (2021). Sceptical Doubt and Disbelief in Modern Europe-an Thought. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55362-3 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Silva Filho, W. J. (Ed.). (2005). O ceticismo e a possibilidade da filosofia. Ijuí: Editoria Unijuí. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Silva Filho, W. J., & Smith, P. J. (Eds.). (2007). Ensaios sobre o ceticismo. São Paulo: Alameda editorial. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Silva Filho, W. J., & Smith, P. J. (Eds.). (2012). As consequências do ceticismo. São Paulo: Alameda editorial. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (Ed.). (2015). O neopirronismo de Oswaldo Porchat. São Paulo: Alameda editorial. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J., & Otávio, B. (2016). Skepticism in Latin America. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/skepticism-latin-america | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J., & Wrigley, M. B. (Eds.). (2003). O filósofo e sua história: uma homenagem a Oswaldo Porchat. Campinas: Editora Unicamp-CLE. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (1995a). O ceticismo de Hume. São Paulo: Loyola. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (1995b). Terapia e vida comum. Discurso, 25, 69-95. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.1995.37995 [Reprinted in Smith 2005, pp. 49-88.] | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2000). Ceticismo filosófico. São Paulo & Curitiba: EPU-Editora da UFPR. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2005). Do começo da filosofia e outros ensaios. São Paulo: Discurso Editorial. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2005b). La raison sceptique de Hume. In M.-A. Berneir & S. Charles (Eds.), Scepticisme et modernité (pp. 103-122). Saint-Étienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Étienne. | fr |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2008). La Critique de la raison pure face aux scepticismes cartésien, baylien et humien. Dialogue, 47, 463-500. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001221730000281X | fr |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2011a). Pascal ou l’ invention du scepticisme pur à partir de Montaigne et Descartes. In S. Charles & S. Malinowski-Charles (Eds.), Descartes et ses critiques (pp. 115-134). Canada: Les Presses de l’Université Laval. | fr |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2011b). Hume on skeptical arguments In D. Machuca (Ed.), Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy (pp. 171-189). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1991-0_9 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2012). Truth, Ontology, and Deflationism. In G. Hurtado & O. Nudler (Eds.), The furniture of the world: Essays in ontology and metaphysics (pp. 147-169). Amsterdam: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207799_011 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2013a). Bayle and pyrrhonism: Antinomy, method, and history. In S. Charles & P. J. Smith (Eds.), Skepticism in the eighteenth century: Enlightenment, Lumières, Aufklärung (pp. 19-30). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4810-1_2 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2013b). Kant’s criticism and the legacy of modern Scepticism. In S. Charles & P. J. Smith (Eds.), Skepticism in the eighteenth century: Enlightenment, Lumières, Aufklärung (pp. 247-263). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4810-1_17 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2015). O método cético de oposição na filosofia moderna. São Paulo: Alameda Edito-rial. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2016). Stroud’s Neo-Pyrrhonism and the Human Condition. Sképsis, 14, 156-187. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2017). Uma visão cética do mundo: Oswaldo Porchat e a filosofia. São Paulo: Editora da UNESP. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2017b). Hume’s Academic Scepticism in Its French Context. In S. Charles & P. J. Smith (Eds.), Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 345-364). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45424-5 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2020). A experiência do cético. São Paulo: Associação Filosófica Scientiae Studia. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2021). On the Possibility of Knowledge: Skeptical Arguments and Baconian Idols. In R. V. Rosaleny & P. J. Smith (Eds.), Sceptical Doubt and Disbelief in Modern European Thought (pp. 41-62). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55362-3_3 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2022a). O ceticismo sob suspeita. São Paulo: Associação Filosófica Scientiae Studia. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2022b). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94518-3 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Sturm, F. (1998). Philosophy in Brazil. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-ZA004-1 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.31649/sent42.01.147 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5239-3190 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7876-9536 | |
