| dc.contributor.author | Plínio Junqueira Smith | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Плініо Жункейра Сміт | uk |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-11T07:10:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-06-11T07:10:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Plínio Junqueira Smith Neo-Pyrrhonism: a contemporary version of skepticism [Текст] / Plínio Junqueira Smith // Sententiae. – 2023. – № 3. – С. 47-66. | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2075-6461 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2308-8915 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua//handle/123456789/42694 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper presents and argues for a contemporary version of skepticism: neo-Pyrrhonism. Interest in the history of skepticism engendered a new, more complex and attractive conception of skepticism. Accordingly, many philosophers now claim they are skeptics. In line with what they say, I develop neo-Pyrrhonism as I see it. It has a negative part, in which dogmas are criticized, and a positive one: first, the neo-Pyrrhonist lives his life according to his skeptical principles and following everyday life, and, second, he is able to describe philosophically his skeptical view of the world, thereby offering possible solutions to philosophical problems empirically conceived. | en |
| dc.description.abstract | У цій статті представлено й обґрунтовано сучасну версію скептицизму: неопірронізм. Інтерес до історії скептицизму породив нову, складнішу і привабливішу концепцію скептицизму. Тож багато філософів зараз стверджують, що вони скептики. Відповідно до того, що вони кажуть, я теж розвиваю неопірронізм, як його бачу. Він містить негативну частину, в якій критикуються догми, і позитивну: по-перше, неопірроніст у своєму житті йде за своїми скептичними принципами і повсякденністю; по-друге, він здатен філософськи описати свій скептичний погляд на світ, пропонуючи тим самим можливі розв’язки емпірично осягнутих філософських проблем. | uk |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | ВНТУ | uk |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Sententiae. № 3 : 47-66. | en |
| dc.relation.uri | https://sententiae.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/sententiae/article/view/966 | |
| dc.subject | dogmatism | en |
| dc.subject | suspension of judgment | en |
| dc.subject | everyday life | en |
| dc.subject | skeptical view of the world | en |
| dc.subject | догматизм | uk |
| dc.subject | утримання від судження | uk |
| dc.subject | повсякденне життя | uk |
| dc.subject | скептичне бачення світу | uk |
| dc.title | Neo-Pyrrhonism: a contemporary version of skepticism | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Неопірронізм: сучасна версія скептицизму | uk |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.relation.references | Aikin, S. (2010). Epistemology and the regress problem. New York & London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203833247 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Bailey, A. (2002). Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonean Scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198238522.001.0001 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Barnes, J. (1998). The beliefs of a Pyrrhonist. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original sceptics: a controversy (pp. 58-91). Indianapolis & Cambrdige: Hackett. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Barrio, E. (2000). La otra cara del escéptico. In L. H. Dutra & P. J. Smith (Eds.), Ceticismo: perspectivas históricas e filosóficas (pp. 63-80). Florianópolis: NEL. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Berkeley, G. (1998). A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge. (J. Dancy, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford UP. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Bolzani Filho, R. (2013). Acadêmicos versus pirrônicos. São Paulo: Alameda editorial. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Bueno, O. (2015). Realism and anti-realism about science: a Pyrrhonian stance. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, 5(2), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-04031176 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Bueno, Otávio. (2021). Neo-Pyrrhonism, empiricism, and scientific activity. Veritas 66(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2021.1.42184 | la |
| dc.relation.references | Burnyeat, M., & Frede, M. (Eds.). (1998). The original sceptics: a controversy. Indianapolis & Cambrdige: Hackett. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Burnyeat, M. (1998). Can the sceptic live his scepticism? In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original sceptics: a controversy (pp. 25-57). Indianapolis & Cambrdige: Hackett. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Fogelin, R. J. (1994). Pyrrhonian reflections on knowledge and justification. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195089871.001.0001 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Fogelin, R. J. (2003). Walking on the tightrope of reason: the precarious life of a rational animal. Oxford: Oxford UP. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Fogelin, R. J. (2004). “The skeptics are coming! The skeptics are coming!” In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Pyrrhonian skepticism (pp. 161-173). Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195169727.003.0009 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Frede, M. (1998). The Sceptic’s beliefs. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original sceptics: a controversy (pp. 1-24). Indianapolis & Cambrdige: Hackett. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Kornblith, H. (2002). Knowledge and its place in nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199246319.001.0001 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Kornblith, H. (2010). Belief in the face of controversy. In R. Feldman & T. Warfield (Eds.), Disagreement (pp. 29-52). Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226078.003.0003 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Kornblith, H. (2013). Is philosophical knowledge possible? In D. Machuca (Ed.), Disagreement and skepticism (pp. 260-276). New York & London: Routledge, | en |
| dc.relation.references | Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Moore, G. E. (1959). Philosophical papers. London: George Allen & Unwin. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Popkin, R. (2003). The history of skepticism from Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195107678.001.0001 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (2001). Ciência e dialética em Aristóteles. São Paulo: Unesp. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1969 [2007]). O conflito das filosofias. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo (pp. 13-23). São Paulo: Unesp. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1975 [2007]). Prefácio a uma filosofia. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo (pp. 25-39). São Paulo: Unesp. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1979 [2007]). A filosofia e a visão comum do mundo. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo (pp. 41-71). São Paulo: Unesp. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1986a [2007]). Saber comum e ceticismo. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo (pp. 73-88). São Paulo: Unesp. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1986b [2007]). Ceticismo e mundo exterior. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo (pp. 116). São Paulo: Unesp. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.1987.37919 | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1991 [2007]). Sobre o que aparece. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo (pp. 117-145). São Paulo: Unesp. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.1992.37951 | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1993 [2007]). Ceticismo e argumentação. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo (pp. 147-172). São Paulo: Unesp. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1995 [2007]). Verdade, realismo, ceticismo. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo (pp. 173-217). São Paulo: Unesp. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.1995.37994 | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (1996 [2007]). O ceticismo pirrônico e os problemas filosóficos. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo (pp. 219-257). São Paulo: Unesp. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (2001 [2007]). O ceticismo pirrônico e os problemas filosóficos. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo (pp. 259-287). São Paulo: Unesp. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (2003 [2007]). O argumento da loucura. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo (pp. 323-343). São Paulo: Unesp. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (2005 [2007]). Empirismo e ceticismo. In O. Porchat Pereira, Rumo ao ceticismo (pp. 289-322). São Paulo: Unesp. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (2007). Rumo ao ceticismo. São Paulo: Unesp. https://doi.org/10.7476/9788539304486 | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (2013). A noção de phainómenon em Sexto Empírico. Analytica 17(2): 291-323. https://doi.org/10.35920/arf.v17i2.2175 | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O. (2015). “On What Appears”. Sképsis 12, 1-32. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Porchat Pereira, O., Sampaio, T. F., & Prado, Jr. B. (Eds.). (1981). A filosofia e a visão comum do mundo. São Paulo: Brasiliense. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Prado, Jr. B. (1981). Por que rir da filosofia? In Porchat Pereira et al. (Eds.), A filosofia e a visão comum do mundo (pp. 59-97). São Paulo: Brasiliense. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Quine, W. v. O. (1969). Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia UP. https://doi.org/10.7312/quin92204 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Quine, W. v. O. (1980). From a logical point of view. Cambridge, MS: Harvard UP. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c5cx5c | en |
| dc.relation.references | Reed, B. (2019). Skepticism as a way of life. Academia. https://www.academia.edu/39732021/Skepticism_as_a_Way_of_Life | en |
| dc.relation.references | Ribeiro, B. (2021). Sextus, Montaigne, Hume: Pyrrhonizers. Leiden & Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004465541 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Oxford: Blackwell. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Sextus Empiricus. (2000). Outlines of Pyrrhonism. (J. Annas, J. Barnes, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Sextus Empiricus. (2005). Against the logicians. (R. Bett, Ed). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Sienkiewicz, S. (2019). Five Modes of Agrippa: Sextus Empiricus and the Agrippan Modes. Oxford: Oxford UP. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2012). “Truth, ontology, and deflationism”. In G. Hurtado & O. Nudler (Eds.), The furniture of the world: essays in ontology and metaphysics (pp. 147-169). Amsterdam: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207799_011 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2015). “Porchat’s neo-Pyrrhonism: an introductory approach”. Sképsis, 12, 33-50. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2016). “Stroud’s Neo-Pyrrhonism and the Human Condition”. Sképsis, 14, 156-187. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2017). Uma visão cética do mundo: Porchat e a filosofia. São Paulo: Unesp. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2020). A experiência do cético. São Paulo: Scientiae Studia. | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2022). “Wittgenstein and Pyrrhonism: on the nature of philosophy”. Cuadernos Salamantinos de Filosofía, 49, 17-47. https://doi.org/10.36576/2660-9509.49.17 | es |
| dc.relation.references | Smith, P. J. (2023). “Sobre o status metafísico das cores”. Trans/form/ação, 46, 473-500. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2023.v46esp1.p473 | pt |
| dc.relation.references | Strawson, P. F. (1959). Individuals: an essay in descriptive metaphysics. London: Methuen. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Stroud, B. (1984). The significance of philosophical scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198247613.001.0001 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Stroud, B. (1997). Purged Pyrrhonism. Philosophy and phenomenological Research, 57(2), 411-416. https://doi.org/10.2307/2953729 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Stroud, B. (2000). The quest for reality: subjectivism and the metaphysics of colour. Oxford: Oxford UP. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Stroud, B. (2018). Seeing, knowing, understanding. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198809753.001.0001 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.31649/sent42.03.047 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5239-3190 | |
