| dc.contributor.author | Луковина, О. | uk |
| dc.contributor.author | Lukovyna, O. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-05-11T13:13:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-05-11T13:13:24Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Луковина О. Пірронізм, епістемологія незгоди, природа раціональності. Machuca, D. (2022). Pyrrhonism Past and Present: Inquiry, Disagreement, Self-Knowledge, and Rationality. Cham: Springer // Sententiae. 2026. № 1. С. 159-172. URI: https://sententiae.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/sententiae/article/view/1227. | uk, en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2308-8915 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua//handle/123456789/51435 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Review of Machuca, D. (2022). Pyrrhonism Past and Present: Inquiry, Disagreement, Self-Knowledge, and Rationality. Cham: Springer.
 . | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Огляд книги Machuca, D. (2022). Pyrrhonism Past and Present: Inquiry, Disagreement, Self-Knowledge, and Rationality. Cham: Springer. | uk, en |
| dc.language.iso | uk_UA | uk_UA |
| dc.publisher | ВНТУ | uk |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Sententiae. № 1 : 159-172. | en |
| dc.relation.uri | https://sententiae.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/sententiae/article/view/1227 | |
| dc.subject | Секст Емпірик | uk |
| dc.subject | трилема Агріппи | uk |
| dc.subject | утримання від суджень | uk |
| dc.subject | дефляційний раціоналізм | uk |
| dc.subject | нормативність | uk |
| dc.subject | тропи скепсису | uk |
| dc.subject | варіативна індукція | uk |
| dc.subject | Sextus Empiricus | en |
| dc.subject | Agrippa's trilemma | en |
| dc.subject | abstention | en |
| dc.subject | deflationary rationalism | en |
| dc.subject | normativity | en |
| dc.subject | tropes of skepticism | en |
| dc.subject | variational induction | en |
| dc.title | Пірронізм, епістемологія незгоди, природа раціональності. Machuca, D. (2022). Pyrrhonism Past and Present: Inquiry, Disagreement, Self-Knowledge, and Rationality. Cham: Springer. | uk, en |
| dc.title.alternative | Pyrrhonism, the Epistemology of Disagreement, the Nature of Rationality. Machuca, D. (2022). Pyrrhonism Past and Present: Inquiry, Disagreement, Self-Knowledge, and Rationality. Cham: Springer. | en |
| dc.type | Article, professional native edition | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.relation.references | Ballantyne, N. (2013). The problem of historical variability. In D. E. Machuca (Ed.), Disagreement and skepticism (pp. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073346-12 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Ballantyne, N. (2015). The significance of unpossessed evidence. The Philosophical Quarterly, 65(260), 315-335. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqu096 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Cleve, J. van. (2003). Is knowledge easy–or impossible? Externalism as the only alternative to skepticism. In S. Luper (Ed.), The skeptics: Contemporary essays (pp. 45-59). Aldershot: Ashgate. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Fogelin, R. J. (1994). Pyrrhonian reflections on knowledge and justification. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195089871.001.0001 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. Oxford: Oxford UP. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for mortals: How people cope with uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195328981.001.0001 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Lukovyna, O. (2022). Defense of Authentic Neo-Pyrrhonism. Smith, P. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. Cham: Springer. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 41(2), 124-143. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.02.124 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Lukovyna, O. (2023). Contemporariety of Ancient Scepticism [In Ukrainian]. Vogt, K., & Vlasits, J. (Eds.). (2020). Epistemology After Sextus Empiricus. New York: Oxford UP. Sententiae, 42(3), 134-140. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent42.03.134 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Machuca, D. (2020). Epistemology after Sextus Empiricus. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/epistemology-after-sextus-empiricus/ | en |
| dc.relation.references | Machuca, D. E. (2022). Pyrrhonism past and present: Inquiry, disagreement, self-knowledge, and rationality. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91210-9 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Machuca, D. E. (2024). Disagreement. Elements in Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009324458 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Machuca, D. E. (Ed.). (2011a). New essays on ancient Pyrrhonism. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004207769.i-207 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Machuca, D. E. (Ed.). (2011b). Pyrrhonism in ancient, modern, and contemporary philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1991-0 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Machuca, D. E. (Ed.). (2013). Disagreement and skepticism. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073346 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Machuca, D. E. (Ed.). (2018). Moral skepticism: New essays. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315627861 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Machuca, D. E., & Marchand, S. (Eds.). (2019). Les raisons du doute: études sur le scepticisme antique. Paris: Classiques Garnier. | fr |
| dc.relation.references | Machuca, D. E., & Reed, B. (Eds.). (2018). Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present. London: Bloomsbury Academic. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Panych, O. O. (2007). Inquiries on the problem of scepticism in British-American epistemology. Part one: British modern philosophy (Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Reid). [In Ukrainian]. Donetsk: Donetsk National University. | en |
| dc.relation.references | Pietsch, W. (2022). On the epistemology of data science: Conceptual tools for a new inductivism. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86442-2 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Sextus Empiricus. (1933). Outlines of Pyrrhonism (R. G. Bury, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP. https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.sextus_empiricus-outlines_pyrrhonism.1933 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Sextus Empiricus. (2020). Outlines of Pyrrhonism (I, 1-13) [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 39(2), 125137. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.125 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Stanford, P. K. (2006). Exceeding our grasp: Science, history, and the problem of unconceived alternatives. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195174089.001.0001 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Vogt, K. M., & Vlasits, J. (Eds.). (2020). Epistemology after Sextus Empiricus. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190946302.001.0001 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.31649/sent45.01.159 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7876-9536 | |
