Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorМенжулін, Вадимuk
dc.contributor.authorMenzhulin, V.en
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-15T12:38:28Z
dc.date.available2026-05-15T12:38:28Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.citationМенжулін В. З досвіду використання штучного інтелекту істориком філософії: галюцинації та булшит, креативність та адаптивність // Sententiae. 2025. № 3. С. 176-200. URI: https://sententiae.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/sententiae/article/view/1180.uk
dc.identifier.issn2308-8915
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua//handle/123456789/51528
dc.description.abstractThe spread of digital education highlights the risks associated with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in teaching and research on the history of philosophy, particularly violations of academic integrity through the application of large language models such as ChatGPT. To initiate a conceptual engagement with this problem, the author undertook an empirical exploration – a history-of-philosophy “experiment” with this AI agent. It turned out that the system’s responses, alongside a degree of adaptability and creativity, typically contain various distortions and gaps, falsifications and fabrications, including hallucinations and bullshit. The advantages of AI, while avoiding these pitfalls, can be harnessed through classical tools offered by the history of philosophy – careful Socratic questioning, contextual-interpretative reading of texts, and systematic historical-philological source criticism.en
dc.description.abstractПоширення цифрової освіти актуалізує загрози, пов’язані з використанням штучного інтелекту (ШІ) у вивченні та викладанні історії філософії, зокрема порушення принципів академічної доброчесності через застосування великих мовних моделей, як-от ChatGPT. Щоб ініціювати концептуальне осмислення цієї проблеми автор статті здійснив емпіричну розвідку – історико-філософське «випробування» цього агента ШІ. Виявилося, що у відповідях, які ним генеруються, поряд із певною адаптивністю та креативністю зазвичай трапляються різноманітні викривлення та прогалини, фальсифікації та фабрикації, зокрема галюцинації та булшит. Скористатися перевагами ШІ, уникаючи цих пасток, допомагають класичні інструменти з арсеналу історії філософії – уважне розпитування в дусі Сократа, контекстуально-інтерпретативне читання текстів та систематична історико-філологічна критика джерел.uk
dc.language.isouk_UAuk_UA
dc.publisherВНТУuk
dc.relation.ispartofSententiae. № 3 : 176-200.en
dc.relation.urihttps://sententiae.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/sententiae/article/view/1180
dc.subjectісторія філософіїuk
dc.subjectакадемічна доброчесністьuk
dc.subjectміфотворчістьuk
dc.subjectкритичне мисленняuk
dc.subjectкритика джерелuk
dc.subjectінтерпретація текстуuk
dc.subjectкогнітивні викривленняuk
dc.subjecthistory of philosophyen
dc.subjectacademic integrityen
dc.subjectmythmakingen
dc.subjectcritical thinkingen
dc.subjectsource criticismen
dc.subjecttext interpretationen
dc.subjectcognitive distortionsen
dc.titleЗ досвіду використання штучного інтелекту істориком філософії: галюцинації та булшит, креативність та адаптивністьuk
dc.title.alternativeOn the Experience of Using Artificial Intelligence by a Historian of Philosophy: Hallucinations and Bullshit, Creativity and Adaptabilityen
dc.typeArticle, professional native edition
dc.typeArticle
dc.relation.referencesAndroshchuk, A., & Maluga, O. (2024). Use of artificial intelligence in higher education: state and trends. [In Ukrainian]. International Science Journal of Education and Linguistics, 3(2), 27- 35. https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjel.20240302.04en
dc.relation.referencesArieti, S. (1974). Interpretation of schizophrenia. Basic Books.en
dc.relation.referencesArieti, S. (1976). Creativity: The magic synthesis. Basic Books.en
dc.relation.referencesDrach, I., et al. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence in higher education. [In Ukrainian]. International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership, 15, 66-82. https://doi.org/10.31874/2520-6702-2023-15-66-82en
dc.relation.referencesFirt, E. (2025). Analogical reasoning as a core AGI capability. AI Ethics. 5, 5501-5515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00785-7en
dc.relation.referencesFloridi, L. (2023). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198883098.001.0001en
dc.relation.referencesFrankfurt, H. G. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton UP. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400826537en
dc.relation.referencesHossain, M. E., & Islam, M. A. (2024). AI and the future of education: Philosophical questions about the role of artificial intelligence in the classroom. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 8(3), 5541-5547. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803419Sen
dc.relation.referencesJi, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., et al. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), Art. No.: 248, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730en
dc.relation.referencesKarpouzis, K. (2024, September 4). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Ethical Considerations and Insights from Ancient Greek Philosophy. In SETN '24: Proceedings of the 13th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Art. No.: 57, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3688671.3688772en
dc.relation.referencesKim, C.-E. (2024). The logical impossibility of consciousness denial: A formal analysis of AI selfreports. OSF preprint. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/4zvfeen
dc.relation.referencesKim, Y. (2025). Standard neural computation alone is insufficient for logical intelligence [Preprint]. arXiv:2502.02135. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.02135en
dc.relation.referencesKozlovskyi, V. (2023). Methodical Principles and of Digital Education: from the Experience of Teaching Philosophical Disciplines. [In Ukrainian]. NaUKMA Research Papers in Philosophy and Religious Studies, 11-12, 68-80. https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-1678.2023.11- 12.68-80en
dc.relation.referencesLi, Y., Yang, C., & Ettinger, A. (2024). Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 (рр. 3741-3753). Mexico City: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.237en
dc.relation.referencesMaleki, N., Padmanabhan, B., & Dutta, K. (2024). AI Hallucinations: A Misnomer Worth Clarifying. In 2024 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) (pp. 133-138). Singapore: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAI59869.2024.00033en
dc.relation.referencesMenzhulin, V. (2005). Toward the history of relations between philosophy and psychiatry: the psychostructuralism of Silvano Arieti. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophical Thought, (2), 30-50.en
dc.relation.referencesMenzhulin, V. (2006). Laughable, idle and sorrowful in contemporary philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. NaUKMA Research Papers. Vol. 50: Philosophy and Religious Studies, 50, 44-49.en
dc.relation.referencesMenzhulin, V. (2008). Psychobiographical background of the psychoanalytical discoveries and the concept of «creative illness». [In Ukrainian]. NaUKMA Research Papers, Vol. 76: Philosophy and Religious Studies, 76, 11-18.en
dc.relation.referencesMenzhulin, V. (2009). Philosophy, biography and psychoanalysis: the case of Nietzsche. Part 2. “A patient”. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophical Thought, (6), 112-120.en
dc.relation.referencesMenzhulin, V. (2010). Biographical Approach within the Historiography of Philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. NaUKMA, Ahrar Media Group.en
dc.relation.referencesMenzhulin, V. (2012). Philosophical “smuggling”: autobiographical, biographical and psychoanalytical aspects. [In Ukrainian]. NaUKMA Research Papers. Vol. 128: Philosophy and Religious Studies, 128, 3-9.en
dc.relation.referencesMenzhulin, V. (2017). Employing psychological analysis in philosophical biographistics: some risks and possibilities to overcome them. [In Ukrainian]. Actual Problems of Mind, 14, 109- 124. https://doi.org/10.31812/apd.v0i14.1837en
dc.relation.referencesMenzhulin, V. (2017а). On Nonreductive Biography and Eternal Self-Overcoming (Lyuty, Т. Nietzsche. Self-Overcoming. Кyiv: Tempora, 2016). [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 36(1), 166-172. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent36.01.166en
dc.relation.referencesMenzhulin, V. (2018). Biographical encyclopedia (dictionary) as a genre of the contemporary historiography of philosophy: Anglo-American and Ukrainian experience. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 37(1), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent37.01.153en
dc.relation.referencesMenzhulin, V. (2021). Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung on Myths and Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious: Unnoticed Similarity. [In Ukrainian]. NaUKMA Research Papers in Philosophy and Religious Studies, 8, 25-37. https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-1678.2021.8.25-37en
dc.relation.referencesMenzhulin, V. (2021а). Friedrich Nietzsche as a Hero of Pathographies Written on the Territory of Russian Empire. [In Ukrainian]. NaUKMA Research Papers in Philosophy and Religious Studies, 7, 17-29. https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-1678.2021.7.17-29en
dc.relation.referencesMenzhulin, V. (2022). Trending practices and discussions in contemporary English-language historiography of philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 41(3), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.03.43en
dc.relation.referencesMenzhulin, V. (2022а). Thematical fields and methodological coordinates of contemporary Ukrainian historiography of philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. The Ideology and Politics Journal, 1(20), 250-282. https://doi.org/10.36169/2227-6068.2022.01.00008en
dc.relation.referencesMenżulin, W. (2017). Carl Jung oraz Zygmunt Freud: podobieństwa i różnice. Teoria archetypów Carla Gustava Junga. In W. A. Marczyński (Ed.), Hortus (In)Conclusus. Polska i Ukraina: Rozmowy o filozofii i literaturze (s. 123-125). Warszawa: Fundacja na Rzecz Myślenia im. Barbary Skargi.pl
dc.relation.referencesNovet, J. (2025, February 27). OpenAI launching GPT-4.5, its next general-purpose large language model. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/27/openai-launching-gpt-4point5- general-purpose-large-language-model.htmlen
dc.relation.referencesSu, W. J. (2025). Do large language models (really) need statistical foundations? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.19145en
dc.relation.referencesTigard, D.W. (2025, 14 May). On bullshit, large language models, and the need to curb your enthusiasm. AI Ethics, 5, 4863-4873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00743-3en
dc.relation.referencesTolochko, V., Bordyuh, N., & Mironets, L. (2023). Academic integrity and artificial intelligence in educational and scientific activities. [In Ukrainian]. Innovative Pedagogy, (62.2), 25-32. http://www.innovpedagogy.od.ua/archives/2023/62/part2/4.pdfen
dc.relation.referencesVasylchenko, A. (2009). Actions de simulacro. [In Ukrainian]. Philsophical Thought, (4), 75-83.en
dc.relation.referencesWatson, D. (2019). The Rhetoric and Reality of Anthropomorphism in Artificial Intelligence. Minds & Machines, 29, 417-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-019-09506-6en
dc.relation.referencesYurchak, I., Khich, A., & Oksentyuk, V. (2024). Understanding large language models: the future of artificial intelligence. [In Ukrainian]. Computer Design Systems. Theory and Practice, 6(2), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.23939/cds2024.02.051en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.31649/sent44.03.176
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8136-0600


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record