<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

К’єркеґорове поняття естетики та Александер Ґотліб Баумґартен

dc.contributor.authorПасічник, І.uk
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-13T12:16:10Z
dc.date.available2019-06-13T12:16:10Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThe paper discusses the problem of relation of Kierkegaard’s aesthetic conception to the original project of aesthetics of Baumgarten. I demonstrate that Kierkegaard’s aesthetic conception wasn’t inspired by Baumgarten. On the one hand, Kierkegaard wasn’t acquainted with Baumgarten’s texts and he could meet only later interpretations of Baumgarten’s aesthetics as a beautiful science or philosophy of art, if at all; on the other, the conception of aesthetic stage of human existence has nothing to do with epistemic context of Baumgarten’s science of sensitive knowledge. Kierkegaard understands aesthetic as sensuous in the meaning of sensuous immediacy that is here a basis of pleasure, not through the satisfaction of carnal desires, but related to the ability to understand beauty and art. So Kierkegaard’s interpretation of aesthetic as sensuous doesn’t originate from Baumgarten’s aesthetics, but, in a sense, leads to it. The reason for this is that Baumgarten’s project of aesthetics not only gave a stimulus for all later philosophical processes called “aesthetics” but also was – though neglected – their invisible distant background. In this perspective, Kierkegaard’s aesthetic conception is interesting as a random unpredictable hint at Baumgarten’s authentic aesthetics already in the 19thcentury.en
dc.identifier.citationПасічник І. К’єркеґорове поняття естетики та Александер Ґотліб Баумґартен [Текст] / І. Пасічник // Sententiae. – 2016. – № 1. – С. 124-131.uk
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22240/sent34.01.124
dc.identifier.issn2075-6461
dc.identifier.issn2308-8915
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/25761
dc.language.isouk_UAuk_UA
dc.publisherВінницький національний технічний університетuk
dc.relation.ispartofSententiae. № 1 : 124-131.en
dc.relation.referencesJothen, P. (2014). Kierkegaard, Aesthetics, and Selfhood. The Art of Subjectivity. Farnham, Surr.: Ashgate.en
dc.relation.referencesZiolkowski, E. J. (1992). Kierkegaard’s concept of the aesthetic: a semantic leap from Baumgarten. Journal of literature and Theology, 6(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/litthe/6.1.33en
dc.relation.referencesZiolkowski, E. J. (2011). The Literary Kierkegaard. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern UP.en
dc.relation.urihttps://sententiae.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/sententiae/article/view/279
dc.subjectSøren Kierkegaarden
dc.subjectAlexander Baumgartenen
dc.subjectaestheticsen
dc.subjectsensibilityen
dc.subjectsensitive knowledgeen
dc.subjectarten
dc.subjectbeautyen
dc.titleК’єркеґорове поняття естетики та Александер Ґотліб Баумґартенuk
dc.title.alternativeKierkegaard’s Сoncept of the Аesthetics and Alexander Gottlieb Baumgartenen
dc.typeArticle

Файли

Контейнер файлів

Зараз показуємо 1 - 1 з 1
Вантажиться...
Ескіз
Назва:
Пасічник.pdf
Розмір:
263,24 KB
Формат:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Опис:

Ліцензійна угода

Зараз показуємо 1 - 1 з 1
Вантажиться...
Ескіз
Назва:
license.txt
Розмір:
10,07 KB
Формат:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Опис:

Зібрання