Показати скорочену інформацію

dc.contributor.authorBiks, Y. S.en
dc.contributor.authorRatushnyak, O. G.en
dc.contributor.authorБікс, Ю. С.uk
dc.contributor.authorРатушняк, О. Г.uk
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-14T12:41:43Z
dc.date.available2021-04-14T12:41:43Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBiks Y. S. The sustainability of the best alternative when changing the criteria weights in MCDA assessment of envelopes energy efficiency potential [Електронний ресурс] / Y. S. Biks, O. G. Ratushnyak // Матеріали Міжнародної науково-технічної конференції "Інноваційні технології в будівництві, Вінниця", 10-12 листопада 2020 р. – Електрон. текст. дані. – Вінниця : ВНТУ, 2020. – Режим доступу: https://conferences.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/itb/itb2020/paper/view/10856.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua//handle/123456789/31840
dc.description.abstractThe assessment of energy efficient potential of multilayered envelopes was performed by Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques. There were compared eight types of wall assemblies from natural materials: hempcrete, adobe, strawbale panel, earthbag, cordwood, SIP (plywood+ecofiber), hempcrete+straw and energy efficient block. Validation of the best alternative sustainability was calculated by DECERNS MCDA software. Conducted research revealed that the most sensible criteria in weight range of [0.1-0.3] are «cost», «mass» and «u-value». Further analysis of the increasing/decreasing trends in wall assemblies should be conducted to discover the key role of specific criteria weight changing on the priority arrangement of the best wall alternative.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherВНТУuk
dc.relation.ispartofМатеріали Міжнародної науково-технічної конференції "Інноваційні технології в будівництві, Вінниця", 10-12 листопада 2020 р.
dc.relation.urihttps://conferences.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/itb/itb2020/paper/view/10856
dc.subjectTOPSISen
dc.subjectMCDA methodsen
dc.subjectweighting methoden
dc.subjectwall assembliesen
dc.titleThe sustainability of the best alternative when changing the criteria weights in MCDA assessment of envelopes energy efficiency potentialen
dc.typeThesis
dc.identifier.udc621.3.088
dc.relation.referencesBasińska M. The use of multi-criteria optimization to choose solutions for energy-efficient buildings. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Technical Sciences. 2017. Vol. 65, №. 6. P. 815-826. DOI: 10.1515/bpasts-2017-0084.en
dc.relation.referencesWang J. J., Jing Y. Y., Zhang C. F., Zhao J. H. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decisionmaking. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 2009. Vol. 13. №9. Р. 2263-2278. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021.en
dc.relation.referencesStazi F. Thermal Inertia in Energy Efficient Building Envelopes. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12- 813970-7.00001-7.en
dc.relation.referencesBiks Y., Ratushnyak G., Ratushnyak, O. Energy performance assessment of envelopes from organic materials. Architecture Civil Engineering Environment. 2019. № 3: P. 55-67. DOI: 0.21307/ACEE-2019-036.en
dc.relation.referencesISO 13786:2017. Thermal performance of building components ‒ Dynamic thermal characteristics ‒ Calculation methods. URL: https://www.iso.org/ru/standard/65711.html (Last accessed: 10.10.2020).en
dc.relation.referencesSavin V. K. Stroitelnaya fizika: energoprenos. energoyeffektivnost. Energosberezheniye (Building Physics: Energy transfer. Energy efficiency. Energy Saving). Moscow: Lazur, 2005. 432 p. (in Russian).en
dc.relation.referencesSaaty T. L. (Prinyatiye resheniy pri zavisimostyakh i obratnіkh svyazyakh: Analiticheskiye seti: per. s angl) (Decisionmaking with dependencies and inverse connections: Analytical networks: Translated from English). Moscow: LIBROCOM Book House 2009. 360 p. (in Russian).en
dc.relation.referencesDECERNS MCDA. URL: http://decerns.com/mcda.html (Last accessed: 18.10.2020).en


Файли в цьому документі

Thumbnail

Даний документ включений в наступну(і) колекцію(ї)

Показати скорочену інформацію