Показати скорочену інформацію

dc.contributor.authorBiks, Yu.en
dc.contributor.authorRatushnyak, G.en
dc.contributor.authorRatushnyak, О.en
dc.contributor.authorБікс, Ю. С.en
dc.contributor.authorРатушняк, Г. С.en
dc.contributor.authorРатушняк, О. Г.en
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-15T12:01:56Z
dc.date.available2026-05-15T12:01:56Z
dc.date.issued2026en
dc.identifier.citationBiks Yu., Ratushnyak G., Ratushnyak О. Regarding several new criteria for the energy-efficient envelope’s potential assessment // Civil Engineering Journal. 2026. Vol. 35, no. 1. P. 48-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2026.01.0004.en
dc.identifier.issn2581-1037en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua//handle/123456789/51519
dc.description.abstractThis paper introduces a set of new criteria for assessing the energy-efficiency potential of multilayered building envelopes, focusing on physically measurable aspects of dynamic thermal performance and LCA parameters. Based on EN ISO 13786:2023, the study considers thermal transmittance (U-value), internal areal heat capacity (k1), and decrement factor (f) as thermal performance parameters, along with assembly mass (m) and embodied energy (EE) as additional LCA objective indicators. Five wall assemblies common in the Ukrainian market - hempcrete, AAC + Rockwool, Porotherm brickwork + Rockwool, wood-chip cement-bonded blocks (Woodcrete) and ICF systems were evaluated through numerical modelling and comparative analysis. To eliminate subjectivity in criteria weighting, three new interconnected criteria were proposed: Dynamic Thermal Performance Efficiency per mass (DTPEm), per embodied energy (DTPEEE), and per both (DTPEm&EE). Results indicate that AAC + Rockwool (Wall B) consistently ranks as the most efficient assembly according to the DTPEm&EE criteria. At the same time, Wall E (ICF) aligns with the recommended thermal inertia ranges but exhibits the highest embodied energy, resulting in the lowest DTPEm&EE. The study highlights the complexity of MCDA in envelope design and provides physically grounded criteria that can support more objective predesign decision-making.uk_UA
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Gadjah Madaen
dc.relation.ispartofCivil Engineering Journal. Vol. 35, no. 1 : 48-65.en
dc.subjectDynamic thermal performance efficiencyen
dc.subjectMultilayered assemblyen
dc.subjectEnvelopesen
dc.subjectEnergy efficiencyen
dc.subjectPhysical parametersen
dc.titleRegarding several new criteria for the energy-efficient envelope’s potential assessmenten
dc.typeArticle, professional foreign edition
dc.relation.referenceshttps://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/cej/article/view/10901en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2026.01.0004en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/en


Файли в цьому документі

Thumbnail

Даний документ включений в наступну(і) колекцію(ї)

Показати скорочену інформацію