Показати скорочену інформацію

dc.contributor.authorBiks, Y. S.en
dc.contributor.authorRatushnyak, O. G.en
dc.contributor.authorБікс, Ю. С.uk
dc.contributor.authorРатушняк, О. Г.uk
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-29T08:32:34Z
dc.date.available2022-11-29T08:32:34Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBiks Y. S. MCDA assessment of multi-layered envelopes. Case of additive and multiplicative convolution [Текст] / Y. S. Biks, O. G. Ratushnyak // Матеріали Міжнародної науково-технічної конференції "Інноваційні технології в будівництві", Вінниця, 25 листопада 2022 р. – Електрон. текст. дані. – 2022. – Режим доступу: https://conferences.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/itb/itb2022/paper/view/16720.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua//handle/123456789/35986
dc.description.abstractThe Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)has been proposed for the choice of the “best” multilayered assembly in terms of its thermal resistance, mass and cost assessment. In the general case, the multilayered assembly can consist of the bearing layer and the insulation layer. In some cases (autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC), hempcrete, etc.) it could be enough to erect the external wall of the building without any additional layer of insulator which meets the National Code`s thermal resistance requirements. As a basic consideration of current research as a bearing layer such materials were taken – clay brick, AAC and hempcrete. As an insulator, two types of material were taken – Rockwool and expanded polystyrene (EPS) as commonly used in Ukraine. As key influence criteria were taken into consideration as follows: the u-value of the envelope W/m2K, the cost of the wall material, UAH/m2 and the mass of the wall kg/m2. All possible com- binations of single-layered and multilayered assemblies the initiated types of materials, which met Ukrainian ther- mal resistance requirements have been created and the calculus of the proposed criteria was performed. The analysis of obtained result revealed that the “best” case of multilayered assembly depends on the method which was applied for the MCDA assessment. Thus, in the case of additive criteria convolution, the “best” alternative is AAC with EPS insulation as well in the case of multiplication convolution. All the above-mentioned highlights that the engineer on site or decision- making person should avoid the temptation to choose the wrong “best” alternative in the erecting of MCDA-evaluated multilayered walls. As well the additional factors of influence should be taken into consideration in terms of compared criteria and assessment methods respectively.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherВНТУuk
dc.relation.ispartofМатеріали Міжнародної науково-технічної конференції "Інноваційні технології в будівництві", Вінниця, 25 листопада 2022 р.uk
dc.relation.urihttps://conferences.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/itb/itb2022/paper/view/16720
dc.subjectMCDAen
dc.subjectwall assembliesen
dc.subjectthe best alternativeen
dc.titleMCDA assessment of multi-layered envelopes. Case of additive and multiplicative convolutionen
dc.typeThesis
dc.identifier.udc621.3.088
dc.relation.referencesBasińska M. The use of multi-criteria optimization to choose solutions for energy-efficient buildings. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Technical Sciences. 2017. Vol. 65, No. 6. P. 815-826. DOI: 10.1515/bpasts-2017-0084.en
dc.relation.referencesWang J. J., Jing Y. Y., Zhang C. F., Zhao J. H. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision- making. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 2009. Vol. 13. No9. Р. 2263-2278. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021.en
dc.relation.referencesStazi F. Thermal Inertia in Energy Efficient Building Envelopes. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12- 813970-7.00001-7.en
dc.relation.referencesBiks Y., Ratushnyak G., Ratushnyak, O. Energy performance assessment of envelopes from organic materials. Architecture Civil Engineering Environment. 2019. No 3: P. 55-67. DOI: 0.21307/ACEE-2019-036.en
dc.relation.referencesThakkar J. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Springer, 2021. Vol. 336. P. 1-365.en
dc.relation.referencesDSTU-N. B. V. 2.6-189:2013. Methods for the selection of heat-insulating material for the insulation of buildings. [Valid from 2014-01-01]. Official issue Kiev: Ministry of Region of Ukraine, 2014. 40 p. (in Ukrainian).en
dc.relation.referencesDBN V. 2.6-31:2017. Thermal insulation of buildings. [Valid from 2017-05-01]. Official issue Kiev: Ministry of Regional Development, Construction and Housing and Communal Services of Ukraine, 2017. 33 p. (in Ukrainian).en
dc.relation.referencesPyhton TM. URL: https://www.python.org (Last accessed: 18.11.2022).en
dc.relation.referencesISO 13786:2017. Thermal performance of building components ‒ Dynamic thermal characteristics ‒ Calculation methods. URL: https://www.iso.org/ru/standard/65711.html (Last accessed: 10.10.2020)en


Файли в цьому документі

Thumbnail

Даний документ включений в наступну(і) колекцію(ї)

Показати скорочену інформацію