Показати скорочену інформацію

dc.contributor.authorGrechanyuk, Е.en
dc.contributor.authorIshchenko, V.en
dc.contributor.authorГречанюк, Є. В.uk
dc.contributor.authorІщенко, В. А.uk
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-20T12:24:40Z
dc.date.available2026-03-20T12:24:40Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.citationGrechanyuk E., Ishchenko V. Analysis of data on the generation of waste electrical and electronic equipment // Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources. 2025. Vol. 16, № 2. P. 137–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63341/esbur/2.2025.137.en
dc.identifier.issn2415-3184
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua//handle/123456789/50915
dc.description.abstractThe amount of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) is growing rapidly worldwide, outpacing the development of infrastructure for its collection and recycling. This aggravates environmental challenges and exacerbates the shortage of critical resources. The study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of approaches to WEEE management in Ukraine, the European Union, Africa, Latin America, the United States, Australia and Brazil. The study emphasised the identification of differences in regulatory approaches, collection rates, recycling methods, and formulating recommendations for the implementation of effective practices in the Ukrainian context. The methodology included a systematic analysis of the legislative framework, statistical methods for assessing the dynamics of WEEE generation and collection, a comparative geographical analysis of national models, and a content analysis of regulatory documents. The study demonstrated that the EU has the most structured waste management model based on the principle of extended producer responsibility, but even with clear standards in place, collection rates are significantly lower than target values. In the US, WEEE management is fragmented and lacks uniform federal regulation, which makes it difficult to compile reliable statistics. Australia demonstrates the effectiveness of co-regulatory approaches, while Brazil demonstrates the unique integration of the informal sector into the official reverse logistics system. A comprehensive combination of legislative, infrastructural and behavioural dimensions of EPR management in five countries with different economic models is considered. The practical significance of the study is determined by the formulation of recommendations for Ukraine on the implementation of extended producer responsibility, the development of a monitoring system, increasing market transparency and adapting successful international instruments for the transition to a circular economy.en
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIvano Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gasen
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources. Vol. 16, № 2 : 137–150.en
dc.subjectelectronic wasteen
dc.subjectextended producer responsibilityen
dc.subjectcircular economyen
dc.subjectinternational management modelsen
dc.subjectcollection infrastructureen
dc.subjectenvironmental policyen
dc.titleAnalysis of data on the generation of waste electrical and electronic equipmenten
dc.typeArticle, Scopus-WoS
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.udc504.054
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.63341/esbur/2.2025
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-5687-2269
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8464-1096


Файли в цьому документі

Thumbnail

Даний документ включений в наступну(і) колекцію(ї)

Показати скорочену інформацію