| dc.contributor.author | Didur, V. O. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Khoshaba, O. M. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Хошаба, О. М. | uk |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-08T09:19:14Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-08T09:19:14Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Didur V. O., Khoshaba O. M. Development of a software tool for an electronic diary and student assessment in educational institutions // Збірник матеріалів Міжнародної науково-практичної Інтернет-конференції «Електронні інформаційні ресурси: створення, використання, доступ та управління», 20-21 листопада 2025 р. Суми ; Вінниця. 2025. С. 15-18. | uk |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-617-7422-25-8 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua//handle/123456789/50385 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The theses examine the design and development of a software tool that combines the functions of an electronic diary and student assessment management within educational institutions. The text situates the problem in the broader context of student information systems and the increasing reliance on web-based gradebooks to manage attendance, grading and reporting. Drawing on empirical and review literature, it outlines both the affordances and risks of online gradebooks in relation to transparency, learner stress and parental involvement. It argues that software design must be informed by contemporary understandings of self-regulated learning, learning analytics dashboards and validity and reliability in digital assessment. A conceptual architecture for the tool is proposed, comprising data, application and presentation layers that support configurable grading schemes, outcome-linked rubrics, multi-stakeholder diary views and analytics dashboards. Particular attention is given to data protection and student privacy, with reference to current guidance and legal frameworks. The theses conclude that a theoretically grounded, participatory, and privacy-aware approach to software design can support a more meaningful use of assessment data, strengthen home–school communication, and contribute to a more reflective and equitable assessment culture in schools. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | ВНТУ | uk |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Збірник матеріалів Міжнародної науково-практичної Інтернет-конференції «Електронні інформаційні ресурси: створення, використання, доступ та управління», 20-21 листопада 2025 р. : 15-18. | uk |
| dc.subject | electronic gradebook | en |
| dc.subject | student information systems | en |
| dc.subject | formative assessment | en |
| dc.subject | learning analytics dashboards | en |
| dc.subject | parental involvement | en |
| dc.subject | self-regulated learning | en |
| dc.subject | data protection | en |
| dc.subject | school management software | en |
| dc.title | Development of a software tool for an electronic diary and student assessment in educational institutions | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.relation.references | S. Ngoma, “An Exploration of the Effectiveness of SIS in Managing Student Performance,” ERIC
Document ED507625, 2009 | en |
| dc.relation.references | J. W. Miller, K. P. Brady and L. T. Izumi, “Stripping the wizard’s curtain: Examining the practice of
online gradebooks,” School Community Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, 2016. | en |
| dc.relation.references | G. L. Quinito and R. A. Namoco, “Performance evaluation and perceptions of the Online Grade Book
Management System (OGMS),” SIJ Transactions on Computer Science Engineering & its Applications, vol. 3, no.
3, 2015. | en |
| dc.relation.references | L. B. Zieger and J. Tan, “Improving parent involvement in secondary schools through communication
technology,” Journal of Literacy and Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, 2012. | en |
| dc.relation.references | D. Szabó, K. Győri, P. Lajos and G. Pusztai, “Systematic literature review on parental involvement in
digital education,” Journal of Media Literacy Education, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 98–107, 2024. | en |
| dc.relation.references | W. Matcha, N. A. Uzir, D. Gašević and A. Pardo, “A systematic review of empirical studies on learning
analytics dashboards: A self-regulated learning perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 13,
no. 2, pp. 226–245, Apr.–Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2019.2916802. | en |
| dc.relation.references | I. Masiello, Z. (A.) Mohseni, F. Palma, S. Nordmark, H. Augustsson and R. Rundquist, “A current
overview of the use of learning analytics dashboards,” Education Sciences, vol. 14, no. 1, art. 82, 2024, doi:
10.3390/educsci14010082. | en |
| dc.relation.references | D. Hopster-den Otter, L. Wools, T. Eggen and B. P. Veldkamp, “The validity of technology enhanced
assessments - Threats and opportunities,” in Technology Enhanced Assessment, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019 | en |
| dc.relation.references | NWEA, Not All Assessment Data Are Equal: Why Validity and Reliability Matter, Portland, OR, USA,
2020 | en |
| dc.relation.references | Department for Education, “Data protection in schools,” GOV.UK Guidance, Feb. 2023, updated Oct.
2025. | en |
| dc.relation.references | U.S. Department of Education, “Protecting student privacy,” StudentPrivacy.ed.gov, accessed Nov.
2025 | en |